Doctoral Student kicked out because she does not believe gays are born that way

Sure, homosexuals working in the Catholic Church as priests.

Who did you think I was referring to?

- - - Updated - - -

Knowing the consequences of giving homosexuals an inch I sure would go back to the days when gays were in the closet and children studied math and science in school rather than the latest homo sex positions.

 

feel free to read in this entire thread where I state clearly that the school has the right to dump her.

So, are you here to discuss the topic or to try and portray a poster as something they are not, but your little gang is trying to portray him as?

Those childish games are allowed in the gay subforum, not in current events. And as you seem to not have learned, the games won't work on me because I am consistent. But, I wish you good luck


attn mods given that the post by the member in quotes, it's safe to say that his/her post is not on topic but is about me.

 

correct and in the same light the misguided professor believes gays are born that way. The "gay gene" has not yet been discovered so there is no science to support either theory.

 

Does not change the fact that this has even less of the full story than the previous thread, and yet you are not inventing any "other side" to the story.

I can't be (*)(*)(*)(*)ed about the topic until more evidence shows up. I feel the need to repeat myself:

Whereas in the other case, you could reasonably comment on it given the breadth of reporting on it and the fact that the case had, in fact, been resolved. If it was just as this woman said, she's definitely in the right. I doubt that she is definitely in the right, for the simple reason that this is one side of a story, there's been no court case, and a professor overreacting like that seems astonishingly unlikely. Honestly, I'm surprised you brought it up, given your strict dedication to having both sides of a story.

Yes, that last post was about you - your incredible inconsistency. I'm just (*)(*)(*)(*)ing sick of it.

 

thank you for the honesty. I understand that exposing the hypocrisy of the left and gay movement does not sit well with you but that is what I'm guilty of doing.

 

Buddy, the only hypocrisy on display here is your own. And yes, the professor would be hypocritical if we can confirm the allegations herein. But we can't yet. So hang tight, and try not to say one thing then do another, will ya?

 

Uh... new to America?

Because when representing a minority... it is important to make race an issue.

Always has been.

Ask Al, Jesse, King, Lee, Foxx, etc.

It helps get the support of a whole lot of like-skinned people.

 

are you calming down? Look, I apologize if leftists and their hypocrisy is embarrassing; it should be. I support that the school can dump her, I support that a bakery can refuse service. I support the right for a gay kid to extract money via a lawsuit.

What I don't support is when people try to make a story into more than what it is. I posted this story to portray the intolerant left and it did just that. That is not well received by many here. So, I have come to expect the types of responses I receive which are personal attacks because there is no defense even for this "tolerant professor"

Are you willing to admit that the left isn't as tolerant as they portray themselves?

 

wait. so you support a school's right to be intolerant and then turn around and complain when they are? LOL You can't have it both ways.

If you TRULY supported that right, this would be a non issue for you, or mayhaps it IS a non issue to you and you were merely looking for a "gotcha" moment.

Pathetic.

 

pointing out the hypocrisy has been accomplished. The left claims to be oh so tolerant yet this is what is done when a person has a different opinion. I applaud your effort at trying to portray this as something else. It's a failed effort but at least you attempted

 

Man I know exactly what it was, the same thing as 99% of threads on political message boards is. A whiny attempt to make "the other side" look as bad as possible without any basis in fact.

What I said is completely factual. You can't state you support a right and then complain when people you disagree with exercise that right. It's just illogical, and or hypocritical.

Of course some on the left claim to be tolerant when they are not. So do some on the right, where is your thread about them? THAT is my point.

 

And if you don't understand why this kind of thing leads to outbursts that make my anger management therapist cry, you have absolutely zero self-awareness.

Yes. And this guy posted his story to portray the racism in the courts regarding Stand Your Ground. Should we just suddenly not care about the details or how much we actually know about the issue?

Of course not - you're taking a story published on a blatantly anti-gay website (it touts its affiliation with the American Family Association - that kind of says it all) where all of the information present was given by the woman's lawyer. Not only is this incredibly hypocritical of you given your last thread, but it's also amazingly dumb given how little we actually know about the case. You have a burden of proof meter that flips wildly from side to side depending on what the issue is about, and you need to understand how unreasonable that is.

Nobody is calling him tolerant. The only "defense" offered is the only reasonable one: the evidence is entirely one-sided with absolutely no closure to the case.

Once you define both "the left" and how tolerant they portray themselves as, we can talk about it. But you use incredibly vague terms to describe a massive group.

 

If you were actually in search of some facts and truth instead of twisting things to match your bias, you would have noticed that while there is not a scientific consensus on the root CAUSES of homosexuality (which could well have numerous causes), there IS SCIENTIFIC consensus that homosexuals simply don't "choose" or "decide" at a young age to find a same sex person's ass or chest to be hot, and an opposite sex person's similar attribute to be boring.

And there is ABSOLUTELY ZERO basis to think that a school sex education class, even if they DID include "homosexual positions" as some of our more irrational members allege, causes ANYONE to become "homosexual".

Perhaps one of the many here who believe that sort of nonsense of "homosexuality as choice" could explain to us what made THEM decide to choose to be straight rather than gay, and and how they dealt with the pubescent excitement of attraction to the hot and cool same sex people they knew?

 

So this is the same thing with to be kicked out for not believing in Aliens . Although aliens have more evidence than gays .

 

Apparently you are too daft to comprehend that the the professor is an idealogue and is teaching theory as if it is fact. There has been ZERO scientific confirmation that gays are born that way.

If anyone is more wrong here by being an idealogue it is the professor and the school for allowing, what is essentially myth at this point, to be taught as fact.

 

close the border and that will reduce the aliens

 

WHAT? It's a private university fool. They can teach that the moon is made out of cheese and if you don't like it (*)(*)(*)(*).

Do you understand the concept of private property?

 

You need to do more reading and some logical thinking. We currently have a FALSE CENTER that it way to the right of where it was when we had a successful country. We need pull from the extreme left to bring it back.

 

A Pedophile is not necessarily Homosexual as they are two different things.

AboveAlpha

 

QUOTE=conhog;1062881834]Over reach? Private college, they can admit who they like. As it should be.[/QUOTE] Not that this school would, but do you think that the school should be able to exclude Black students who support Zimmerman??

 

Being a leftist means destroying everyone who thinks differently then you while taking comfort in the fact that the right will not return the favor and still come see your crappy movie, attend your class, and pay our taxes.

 

Although the Extreme Left tend to side with Gay Rights to a much greater extent than the Extreme Right...being either Conservative or Liberal does not define how a person views Gay Rights.

I am a case in point.

I am Fiscally Conservative but Socially Liberal.

I do find watching a couple of men french kissing in public to be disgusting but that is just my opinion and I would fight to protect their rights to do so.

And most men who are straight would be lying if they said they would be disgusted watching two Gay Women French Kiss...as long as they are attractive....to be disgusting! LOL!

In many cases it is not a case of a persons religion but a persons security in their sexuality that is driving such bigotry as well many Gay's do not seem to understand just because a person like myself supports their rights doesn't mean I would enjoy watching any in this case Male Homosexual sexuality upon any level.

Both sides need to grow up.

Gay's do not do their cause any good when they flaunt it in such areas as when the Boston St. Patrick's Day Parade was cancelled by those running it rather than allow Gay Marchers to participate as they had won in court.

That little stunt probably set back Gay Right's 10 years.

As well when Religious people start screaming the being Homosexual is an afront to GOD...well that is just un- Christian and mean.

Gay people are just....PEOPLE...same as anyone else. Their sexual preferences are just a bit different.

And WHY IN HELL do some men feel threatened by Gay's? I mean what are they afraid of...the Gay Guy is going to give them a manicure or something? LOL!

AboveAlpha

 

Or something....and that they might like it.

 

The evidence about the origins of homosexuality....swings both ways.

 

Refer to my signature.

YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!