New York Times Spins the New Benghazi Emails

They don't "suggest" blatant politicization of the death of four Americans. They virtually scream it!

The fact that Obama was hyping himself as the great conqueror of Al Qaeda (snort!) during the presidential campaign helps explain why the Benghazi attack forced the Dark Side into a ridiculous lie which they now must continue no matter what (No, seriously. Everyone said the Muslim dudes that flipped out over that video attacked that State Department compound.
I mean, sure it makes zero sense for some random gathering of screaming lunatics to be lugging around automatic weapons and grenade launchers
but I guess if you're going to go straight from some street protest to an eight hour, well coordinated assault on a CIA safe house those are the sorts of things you will need to have.)

Because once you use a blatant lie you cannot then discard it for anything. Jay Carney is still claiming that Obama and Clinton were
using the best intelligence available at the time....which is an idiotic transparent lie but that's the story they are stuck with.

And there is a time to lie your ass off, and Madame Hillary and Obama are still stuck in the middle of it. That time too will come to an end, eventually, however.

 

I've already answered this question in post #21 of this thread.

 

Everybody has answered it.
It's the sort of "question" that's asked frequently because the Obama apologists have run out of things to say and places to run.

The left is losing their minds over Benghazi.

 

So what you are saying sounds like: "The American ambassador is dead. Killed by weapons that were given to Al-Quaeda (a terrorist organization that we are currently at war with) by someone in our government without consulting congress. Clearly nobody is to blame. Definitely not someone in the current administration because I voted for them!"

What is the definition of treason sound like in your book of government, because someone clearly crossed the line this time. I don't really care that Hillary doesn't care.

 

Now I could be wrong about this but since in 2012 I predicted on a different forums system that even if Obama won re-election Benghazi-gate would become an albatross around his administration's neck and that of the Dem Party leadership and I have been absolutely correct in that, I predict that our leftwingers are no where near to loosing their minds over Benghazi-gate as they will be if the GOP wins the 2014 mid term elections to retake the Senate, even if only by a thin numerical margin; because at that point the GOP leadership just might appoint a Special Prosecutor to investigate.

 

Liberal defenders of the indefensible are peeling away the more Benghazi evidence comes out and what we are left with is only the most dogmatic, repugnant and unthinking of apologists left over.

There is no safe ground left to stand on. Their unethical cause is slowly sinking beneath their own feet.

 

No of course he will lie. Just need to get him in that position under oath so the rest of the nation can finally admit they were wrong in electing him. I think they owe the rest of us an apology.

 

True, and it's also true that Bush and his cronies had a crew in the New York Times printing lies for their administration during the lead up to the Iraq fiasco. Face it folks, the press works for the agenda of whichever party hack they helped to elect whether it's a Demikin or a Republicrat. The difference between these two farcical entities (Democrat and Republican) is only in the rhetoric they deal in. They both work for the bank swindling war profiteers that own the real power in the world.

Cheers

 

John Cass:

This is how a republic dies.

 

The 'crats are concerned, sure, but they're not "losing their minds"... at least, not yet! Their propaganda spinners in the hyperlib "news" media will be ignoring the new evidence in this despicable story as much as possible, redirecting the attention of the American cattle to such important topics as circus accidents and the ENDLESS saga of Donald Sterling's racism....

Nevertheless, the Obama-lovers do have a potential problem, if only because one of their worse nightmares is going to be heading a special investigative committee to dig into this whole Benghazi sewer with special powers:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...-benghazi-committee-wants-trey-gowdy-to-lead/
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/05/02/benghazi-select-committee-n1832705

Not only that, but to the wonderment of all, Darrell Issa has actually nailed John Kerry with a SUBPOENA, and that will force him to testify on Benghazi! Now the underlings have something to worry about, because THEY will be the ones who will be destroyed so that Kerry, Hillary, and the White House slimebags are protected. That, in turn, could lead to some interesting spontaneous "confessions" coming out of the galley slaves who row Obama's boat, because none of them want to lose their cushy jobs, or worse, get hauled up the pole to face ruin and prison sentences.

Trey Gowdy is a bulldog! It's no secret that he despises Obama's regime and everything this America-hating socialist stands for. If anybody can rip the guts out of the soft "underbelly" of all the regime's lies, cover-ups, and deceit, it will be Trey Gowdy!

 

Very nice! But there is one more aspect about Kerry to give some serious consideration to . . . which is that he has every intention of becoming the next Democratic Party president, which is why he became Obama's Secretary of State to begin with, seeing that as the new launch vehicle for so-so dems to launch new tries for the presidency.

So . . . keeping that in mind and that it's in his best interests to find some way to make the current Dem Party's presidential candidate heir apparent and MSM darling, Hillary Clinton, look as bad as possible and because he actually was not involved in Benghazi-gate, he just might 'arrange' for things to begin slipping out about Hillary's real involvement that fateful night and her role in the post event cover-up conspiracy between herself and former C.I.A. director Leon Panetta and Obama . . . oh my!

Post Script: All of this is especially true as at least a possibility if for no other reason that since becoming Secretary of State John Kerry has been giving both Obama and Biden a run for their money as incompetent and endlessly bungling Clown Prince. So he's becoming desperate at this point to find some way to make himself look good in comparison to Crown Princess Hillary Clinton.

 

like 911, it will never be resolved, terrorist attacked us... we can take precautions to prevent this in the future... but we will always have some risk... that is life

republicans probably blame the victims of home burglary rather then blaming the criminals too, even with your doors locked, you still have risk... that is just life

.

 

It's not about the physical attack, it is about the lazy response and coverup.

 

What's your definition of "resolved"? When Obama, Rice and Clinton are found guilty and imprisoned?

I'm pretty sure that's the case. Well it ain't going to happen so Fox will have to find another tragedy to exploit to rile up the right wingers.

 

No. Just relax and look at things clearly. Obama will NOT be able to be POTUS again. Whatever you are watching or listening to is seriously clouding your ability to think clearly.

 

Honestly, I had not even considered that Kerry would be making another run for the presidency, but, damn! You could be right! A schism in the Eastern Liberal-Limousine power bloc that controls nearly all contemporary Left-wing thought? You make some interesting points, and, no, he probably did not have a direct role in Benghazi-gate. But the poor bastards under him, and under Hillary, have had to keep this debacle from blowing up (with the deliberate negligence and other help of the "news" media, of course). And when it gets down to the minutiae of who-knew-what, and when, it's going to be very uncomfortable among them -- especially with an energetic, determined investigator like Trey Gowdy prying them out of their hidey-holes with a crowbar....

One question, though -- How's Kerry going to win the Demo nomination without Jewish support? He made a lot of Jewish people (and others) mad with all the talk about Israel becoming an "apartheid" state....

 

You'd think it would be impossible, but recall that most Jews vote Democrat for some weird reason -- when it's been the Republicans for the last few decades supporting Israel over liberal objections -- and so if he becomes a front runner during the primaries the chances are good that the idiots will forgive him everything . . . especially if he hints that he was relaying Obama's thoughts about them instead of offering his own opinion. If he hints to them that Obama is a closet Jew hater that will even be better.

The really neat thing is that Obama will be expected to keep his big mouth SHUT during the Democratic Party's primaries since the only possible way any of the Dem candidates can make themselves seem appealing is to trash Obama and his policies while distancing themselves as much as possible from both. So Obama will -- for once -- be expected by the DNC itself to keep his mouth shut and just take it . . . like a Republican . . .

 

Carney is the proof. If only someone would water board that lying sack of manure.

 

As was Nixon's investigation into the burglarized DNC which Republicans fought against. As was Clinton's investigation into sex with an intern which Democrats fought against. And now it's the investigation into Benghazi which the Democrats are fighting. Of course it's politics, and both sides play it. So deal with it and just let the process play out.

 

Oblah-blah isn't accountable for anything, so I guess no President has to be for either side. I still would like to know why he let them die.

 

Who rushed security forces to the scene? Are you referring to the agents at the nearby annex who rushed to the consulate? Nobody from the WH directed them. The WH wasn't even in touch with the annex. The CIA chief at Tripoli tried to reach out to the WH to inform someone it was not a demonstration. We shall finally hear from him. Odd he wasn't included in either the SD or Senate investigations. And neither was Clinton for that matter. Imagine, the secretary of state not included in the investigation that killed one of her ambassadors and 3 others. Simply astounding when you hear so many claim a thorough investigation found nothing. Well, if you're not looking in the right places you won't find anything.

 

The sad part is the call came in at 3PM Washington time on a weekday, and no one bothered answering it. Obama was hiding in a closet where he couldn't be found.

 

It is implausible that Obama would ever agree to shut his mouth during the next big Socialist Libocrat convention, but, I cannot disagree with you, given the facts. And right now, the FACT is that Obama's popularity is at 42% and dropping over time. Right now his last big concentration is in keeping the Republicans from taking over the Senate while keeping the House. That would effectively put this "dog" on a very "short leash", and that would be very painful when he's got SUCH a lot more planned to harm this country he obviously hates so much! I have never been able to understand why people as smart and intellectual as the Jewish people I've known would ever support a NOTHINGNESS like empty-suit Obama. It flies right in the face of common sense....

What happened? The distorted Obamacare deception that is costing hundreds of thousands of people their healthcare coverage and jacking up costs. Consistently high prices for energy, especially gasoline and diesel -- and NO promise of a Keystone pipeline to end it! The bizarre, inexplicable obsession with what goes on in foreign countries, like Sudan, Ukraine, and a dozen other third-world toilets scattered around the planet. Most people don't know that Obama has tied us to Afghanistan with commitments until the year 2024, and that we will continue to have nine bases there and thousands of troops! But, considering the unquestioning nature of the average Libocrat supporter, that's not really surprising. As long as the free government goody hits the mailbox on time, they don't give a **** about ANYTHING else! . ****ing parasites....

 

I couldn't have summarized it better myself . . .

 

More Things you MUST believe in order to credit Obama with honor and executive prowess with respect to Benghazi:

4. The Carny is brain damaged. No man can say the contradictory crap he's peddled and NOT be insane. OR he's a shameless liar for the administration.


Here's Brian Beutler from 'TNR':

The first bit is pure magical thinking and wishing away. ONLY THE MOST CORRUPTED MSLSD DRONE COULD BELIEVE THAT HOBAG RICE'S LIES HAVE 'BEEN DEBUNKED'. She lied. The WH authored the lies and coached the lies. The press aided the acceptance of these lies.

The second bit is an effort to reinforce the conspiracy meme. Conservatives are most explosive because the administration lied about American security and battle death for PURE POLITICAL GAIN.