NYT Compares Scott Walker to Sarah Palin In Need for Tutorials to Add 'Depth' -

- See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-gr...need-tutorials-add-depth#sthash.KMPUJSlU.dpuf

BOOM......And now we see how the quick-strike team at the DNC...OOPS...I mean the NYT.... has decided to attack Walker...they're going to give him the Palin treatment. OUCH! And isn't it interesting they use Walker's refusal to answer a reporter's question about "evolution" as a reason to sow 'doubt' while Hillary is out there roping off the press, has refused media questions for months and basically treating reporters like annoying pets?

Anyway, it's started & I expect Walker to get the DNC media "treatment" early and often. He's faced liberal media abuse for years as govenor, but now he's playing in the big league against Soros and the boys, so we'll see how he handles it.

 

DNC indeed.

NY Times Taking a Beating In Its Battle With Ted Cruz

 

Walker is pathetic:

 

The more the butthurt shows through the hate of a lefty, the more confident I am about the candidate they're talking about.

 

The butthurts are the deluded right wingers who support people like Walker.


By contrast we have a patriotic Democrat as governor in Minnesota:

 

Hardly, but I'd say people who use such "made for low info" posters to call him names ranks pretty close to pathetic.

 

That just means that the left FEARS Scott Walker. I hope he doesn't take the bait and play their game.

 

And this is that biased main stream media Trump was talking about. Notice leftys, Trump was right again.

 

Compared to Hillery? Biden? Who?

 

He doesn't believe in evolution?? Or is he just appeasing the right wing base?

 

You are correct. Cruz said it this way; "there are no 'nice' media reporters".
Walker did a one-on-one interview on NBC or CBS (don't remember which one) and is all the interviewer did was harp on Walker about Trump, tried desperately to get Walker to dump on Trump. Walker didn't bite, but it didn't keep the interviewer from wasting Walker's time by badgering him for a "statement".
What frikkin joke these media blowhards have become. It was obvious this interview wasn't to 'interview' Walker about policy, it was strictly to give the interviewer a chance to get a soundbite of Walker dumping on Trump, period. Why any Rep candidate agrees to MSM interviews is beyond me.

 

The lefty media isn't afraid so much as just hateful. Hating the opposition is what they collectively thrive on.

 

Yes, as opposed to the right wing who have shown so much grace in regards to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders....

 

wrong for someone else to use the term but perfectly ok for you to do so

yeah, right

- - - Updated - - -

and the continued and endless hate they have for President Obama

 

Yea, since I seem to know when it's applicable and well.....you get the point.

 

It's quite simple: Don't make stupid statements and support lackluster laws(and block off access to the media) and you'll get fair treatment. Bernie's desire to have us "apologize", has dropped him from my list. Much like Jeb Bush's "Act of Love".

Give me Donald Trump, or Rand Paul or let's go home. Democrats have proven they have little in the way of National candidates.

 

Cool story bro. That's not what the post was about at all.

It's simply about a right winger crying about how Scott Walker is treated, meanwhile the venom towards HC is palpable.
(Deserved or not is not my concern.)

 

Threads like this almost make me feel pity for liberals/democrats. Almost. But the pity doesn't rise to the revulsion.

 

The unemployment rate is 4.5%, has been. That's FULL employment. He they don't need to create a lot of jobs. And the deficit is down from the $3.8 billion he inherited. Not where they want it but on the way there.

But which is it, you want a lower deficit or higher spending. Can't have both. Your talking out both sides of your mouth.

So which of the proposals in his speech that he made do you object to the most?

 

Appeasement. Walker isn't the brightest, but he's not that ignorant.

 

Sorry , but I'm not crying about Walker's treatment, I'm exposing the media for their inept methods of treating ALL candidates without a D by their name. Walker's treatment just happens to be the latest. . I'm been fairly consistent along those lines, so try again....or just go back to sleep...whatever

 

Did you bother to read the original article? Did you bother to find out whether other reliable sources had similar stories?


Scott Walker doesn't appear, outside of first glance, to know much about the outside world, which is actually a good trait for a President to have. After all, look at George W Bush.

So, if they're busy prepping him due to an apparant deficiency in that regard, than it's just smart politics.

They tried it with Bush, but it never took. So they brought in Colin Powell to bring the campaign "gravitas".

Of course, Bush rarely listened to Powell, which is evident from the disasterous curve of his foreign policy.

They tried it with Caribou Barbie too. But she was (and still is apparantly) convinced that she can see everything she ever needed to know on the pages of a supermaket tabloid.

 

Actually, yes I did. Sooooooooooo, do you have a point?

 

Democrat Dayton inherited a huge deficit from Republican Pawlenty. He corrected it and we now have a surplus. Walker has done no such thing.


As Harry S Truman said, if you want to live like a Republican, vote Democrat. It definitely is a smarter thing to do.