The Sharia Court of the United States

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by independent american, Jul 9, 2015.

  1. independent american

    independent american New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2012
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Last week’s Supreme Court two rulings, actually the week before, on the Affordable Care Act and same-sex “marriage”, have reduced the Constitution to a mere scrap of paper and made Congress irrelevant. It doesn’t matter what the Constitution says about budget spending, that Congress has the authority to exercise that, the Supreme Court destroyed that. It doesn’t matter that the Constitution does not say anything about marriage, any kind of marriage, the Supreme Court ignored that. The five justices completely ignored the Tenth Amendment and read into the Fourteenth Amendment their own political views. By doing that, they gave gays and other extremists a free pass to be even more bullying and to destroy even more of what’s left of our freedom.

    As some people observed, the Supreme Court has become the Sharia Court of the United States. It religiously imposes the dogmas of the official religion of society, liberal secularism or political correctness. With the exception of three judges who deserve credit for trying to limit the despotic power of the federal government, the other five and sometimes six of them, have a reverence for political correctness and statism, while they ignore the Constitution.

    Great article about the secular liberal sharia council of the Supreme Court.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...iamson?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referral

    If you think it’ ridiculous to say that secularism is a religion, let me tell you that I didn’t come up with this. Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black did, in 1962, when they took prayer out of schools and he stated in the majority opinion of the Court that secular humanism is a religion. He said it was a religion. They had a problem when they said the religious rights of atheists are infringed upon by having prayer in schools. People asked a logical question, they said how can the religious rights of atheists be infringed upon, if they have no religion? So the secularist leftist judges had to come up with that and say that secular humanism is a religion.

    Just for the record, Hugo Black had ties with the KKK. But you won’t hear the news media talk about that or read it in history textbooks.

    Secularism is defined as the absence of religion or faith. A secular society is supposed to be a society devoid of religion or at least neutral when it comes to religion. But postmodern, liberal secularism is not neutral to religion, it is in fact very religious. It indoctrinates people with a religious reverence for the doctrines of political correctness, like atheism, Darwinian evolutionism, multiculturalism, gay “marriage”, socialism and it turns the State into a god. Secularism religiously and arrogantly imposes its dogmas on the population, and like the Inquisition, it does not tolerate any dissent. People who do dissent and don’t go along with the indoctrination, are punished. They either lose their jobs, have to pay heavy fines or are attacked and demonized in the news and in social media. Secularism is not friendly to the First Amendment.

    As The Wall Street Journal observed in 2004, “Secularism is rapidly becoming the most powerful religious force in America.”

    Another proof that secularism is not neutral to religion is that secularists are always giving Islam preferential treatment. They respect Islam more than they respect any other religion, except their own. The reading of the Koran in public schools or posting the five pillars of Islam on walls in a public school, as it happened in a school district in Ohio, is never seen as a threat to “separation of church and state”. The ACLU never files a lawsuit against schools which do that. But a Christmas Nativity scene in a public place or even the slightest mention of the Bible and God as the Creator of life in a science class, is viewed as a threat by the secular establishment and the ACLU goes hysterical.

    Liberals use God and religion when it suits their purposes. During the healthcare overhaul in 2009, Obama told a group of ministers, pastors and priests, that if they love God, they would support the healthcare bill. Nancy Pelossi said that it is “our Christian duty” to receive the illegal immigrants who crossed the border through Texas a year ago. Please, come on. This comes from a politician who promoted and voted for every kind of anti-Christian legislation so far. How about Pelossi and her political party’s attacks on traditional marriage and the sanctity of life for the unborn? How does that square off with Christian duty? This kind of hypocritical talk from Democrats like Pelosi, is worth a vomit, nothing more.

    Justice Roberts and the four liberal leftist justices have already ruled to make the Affordable Care Act the law of the land, in 2012. That they did it again, shouldn’t surprise anyone. When it comes to Breyer, Gingsburg, Kagan and Sotomayor, they are all rubber stamp judges who always rule in favor of the Communist, Marxist policies imposed by the Obama administration, with no exception. They arrogantly impose their statist Socialist utopia on this entire country. The only surprise is that John Roberts did it again. You would think he learned something from his mistake (although you can’t say for sure that it was a mistake) in 2012, and do the right thing this time. John Roberts is a conservative and a competent judge, that's why he should have known better. Also, Kennedy's ruling on the definition of marriage is somewhat of a surprise. I considered Anthony Kennedy to be a thoughtful man who usually doesn't rush into making a decision on a ruling. But now, he went along with the liberal sharia judges. He allowed himself to believe the lies of gay propaganda. Or maybe he wants to go down in history as one who was "tolerant" and "expanded" the definition of marriage. For a judge with his experience and nominated by Reagan, he has no excuse.

    Both Roberts and Kennedy do deserve some credit though, for getting it right in the Hobby Lobby case.

    The so-called progressive Establishment has almost completed its takeover of the country. The doctrines of liberal secularism or political correctness, the official religion of the Obama administration and the federal government, are imposed on the people.

    Blind obedience and loyalty to the politically correct Establishment and their dogmas, have become the norm. It’s the satanic New World Order. The First Amendment is no longer respected and enforced by the government. Actually, that’s inaccurate. The First Amendment still applies, but only to left wingers, progressives or liberals. They can say anything, offend anyone, destroy people’s reputations and careers, and invoke free speech as the basis for doing what they do. But the First Amendment no longer applies to the majority of Americans who disagree with Obama and the Left. It’s a fact, not an opinion. Any mature person who is honest with themselves can see this.
     
  2. Gorn Captain

    Gorn Captain Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Messages:
    35,580
    Likes Received:
    237
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Let me get your analogy straight?

    You're comparing the US Supreme Court to "Sharia Law"....because they granted rights to homosexuals to marry....

    while Sharia Law is about denying ALL rights to homosexuals?

    Which would be like comparing the American troops who liberated the Buchenwald camp to ....

    the Nazis?
     
  3. smallblue

    smallblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    4,380
    Likes Received:
    570
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "secular liberal sharia"

    Seriously, do you people even hear yourselves?
     
  4. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
  5. Gorn Captain

    Gorn Captain Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Messages:
    35,580
    Likes Received:
    237
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Reminds me of Rightwingers who talk about Obama being BOTH a "Big Business Corporatist"...AND a "Capitalism-hating Marxist"...

    and see absolutely no contradiction in that.


    Or the old M*A*S*H episode where Colonel Flagg of the CIA and Trapper's buddy in the CID investigate Frank...and Hawkeye and Trapper give them each separate files on Frank....one file paints him as a Communist....the other paints him as a neo-Nazi....

    and they confront Frank and both believe their information is accurate and not contradictory.

    Orwell predicted it of course..."doublethink".

    You'll get the Far Right who will claim that THEM forcing the rest of us to live under a fundamentalist Christian theocracy is "freedom" and "democracy"....

    and those who oppose that are "religious zealots who want to impose their religion on us!"
     
  6. wgabrie

    wgabrie Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    13,921
    Likes Received:
    3,088
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Oh, well when someone says the Supreme Court is granting rights not found in the U.S. Constitution I just think of the Ninth Amendment:

    "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

    And I realize that not all rights have to be literally listed in the Constitution in order to be recognized.
     
  7. REPUBLICRAT

    REPUBLICRAT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    Messages:
    4,006
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    48
    LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Giving homosexuals equal rights isn
    t exactly a sharia kind of thing. Unreal. Really trying to be nice. Better stop there.
     
  8. yguy

    yguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    18,423
    Likes Received:
    886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Obviously, but that hardly translates to judicial authority to create rights out of thin air.
     
  9. wgabrie

    wgabrie Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    13,921
    Likes Received:
    3,088
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, it's not out of thin air, it was in the works for a long time.
     
  10. CJtheModerate

    CJtheModerate New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2013
    Messages:
    5,846
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This post is so (*)(*)(*)(*)ing ridiculous that it just earned you a place on my ignore list.
     
  11. yguy

    yguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    18,423
    Likes Received:
    886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't suppose it occurs to you that the right of an adult and a 5 year old to marry has been in the works for a long time.
     
  12. wgabrie

    wgabrie Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    13,921
    Likes Received:
    3,088
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I suppose. If ancient empires is any indications it's happened before.

    Well, child marriage ended within the past few hundred years. I'm sure the reasons for that will stand for the foreseeable future.
     
  13. MaiNutz

    MaiNutz New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2015
    Messages:
    222
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Truth be known,I will personally deliver a boar's head to any Sharia court in the US.
    And I will back that up, too.
    Lay it on their doorstep.
    I like Pork :p
    I eat Bratwurst.
     
  14. independent american

    independent american New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2012
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    0
    For your information, it's big corporate bastards like Soros and Warren Buffett who finance the Communist groups and all things on the far Left. They also contributed to Obama's election campaign. Their target is free market capitalism, and the small to medium businesses.

    The Chinese Commies have no problem doing business and sharing profits with big business corporatists. So there is no contradiction in that. :smile:

    How are conservatives forcing you to live under "a fundamentalist Christian theocracy"?

    Are you being forced to buy religious products or pay for things that you don't believe in? No. But the so-called Affordable Care Act wanted to force us to pay for abortions.

    Are you ever warned not to ridicule the Bible and Christians? I don't think so.

    But the rest of us are warned not to ridicule the Koran or disagree with "gay marriage". Because that would be a "hate crime" and we could lose our jobs or companies might refuse to do business with us.

    It looks like the First Amendment only applies to some, not to all. And that's your idea equality, right?

    American conservatives are not taking people to court over disagreements or statements that offend them. So don't play stupid, it's very plain and clear who is on the side of freedom and who is not.

    "A people who become morally corrupt, will soon be looking for masters". - Benjamin Franklin

    "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father, but through Me". - John 14:6
     
  15. junius. fils

    junius. fils New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2010
    Messages:
    5,270
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just another example of those pinko, commie, tree-hugging, activist, soft on crime, pro-terrorist, anti-white, Kenya-born, islamo-fascist, ANTI-GOD, homosexual traitors who wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

    BA-DA-BING!!!
     
  16. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I get it. Pick someone or something you don't like. Pick something else you don't like, and equate the two. Voila, an argument. Lmao.
     

Share This Page