So, we have a government agency that refuses to do its jobs and threatens congress in the process. I can't believe what is going on in my country. It is falling apart and left is not only accomplices, but they are also cheering its demise. The Obama regime continues to go full throttle with America's destruction.
"No immigration enforcement until amnesty is passed" How about "No more Democrats elected until immigration laws are enforced"
How about no pay until you do your job, you Insubordinate peon. You don't deserve retirement either. Public service or now be arrested for public nuisance x 1,000,000.
I'd agree, but the current neglect to enforce immigration law isn't just Obama's doing. He's only the current chief amnesty enabler. Bush didn't support strict enforcement and the RNC'ers have been trying desperately to appear as if they support enforcement, but in reality they don't. If they did, we wouldn't be where we are today. I have zero respect for either "party" on this issue, zero. They aren't in DC to figure out ways to protect foreigner who break our laws, they're there to protect the integrity of our laws first and foremost. If the law is flawed and it requires change(s), our system has a process for them to follow to do that, but they aren't, and American's are just forced to deal with it. It's wrong. It's destructive and makes a mockery of entire system of representation. American leadership isn't in DC to represent illegals, they're in DC to represent us and place American interests first but with regard to immigration law, clearly they aren't. - - - Updated - - - I'd agree, but the current neglect to enforce immigration law isn't just Obama's doing. He's only the current chief amnesty enabler. Bush didn't support strict enforcement and the RNC'ers have been trying desperately to appear as if they support enforcement, but in reality they don't. If they did, we wouldn't be where we are today. I have zero respect for either "party" on this issue, zero. They aren't in DC to figure out ways to protect foreigner who break our laws, they're there to protect the integrity of our laws first and foremost. If the law is flawed and it requires change(s), our system has a process for them to follow to do that, but they aren't, and American's are just forced to deal with it. It's wrong. It's destructive and makes a mockery of entire system of representation. American leadership isn't in DC to represent illegals, they're in DC to represent us and place American interests first but with regard to immigration law, clearly they aren't.
you have to love the term "comprehensive immigration reform" OK, the term "reform" means changing what exists. So, can I, without repercussion, stop paying taxes until tax "reform" is done? What we hear Democrats say is that the laws get tossed aside until reform is enacted. If it works for illegal aliens then why not for taxes?
Ok. But sanctuary cities have existed since '79. Most were created under Bush. So we have had three Republican administrations who have done nothing to enforce immigration in those same cities. Why do some Republicans continue to insist that roses grow out their butts on the immigration issue?
What did you expect? Obama promised to destroy America [video=youtube;oKxDdxzX0kI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKxDdxzX0kI[/video]
Of course, this tool gets her marching orders from Obama, and here's the message he's sending: I'm perfectly cool with releasing more murderers into your streets. It's time to get Kate's Law passed ASAP and expose the other people who share Obama's wanton disregard for our safety.
Don't you get it, sec? Our lords and masters in Washington are no longer bound by the rule of law. It is one of the greatest legacies bestowed on the unwashed, benighted masses by the Obama Administration and the Roberts Court. And if you continue to behave like the uppity ungrateful kulak that you are, those scofflaws will show you what it's like to live in a fundamentally transformed banana republic. How would you like to be subjected to an expensive John Doe investigation or IRS harassment?
It is true, we ARE a nation of immigrants. ALL of my Grand Parents were immigrants coming here in 1900. The difference is at that time the nation's economy was expanding and there were more jobs than we had people to fill them. Today it's just the opposite, our economy is shrinking and we have too many people for the jobs available. To just let them keep coming is just playing Russian Roulette with our children's and grand children's future. Liberals have literally aborted tens of millions of new Democrat voters and while I think abortion is wrong, it's slowly but surely eliminating the folks that would turn this country into Venezuela, for the good of our country I'm OK with that. In order to stay a viable political party the democrats have to fling the doors open and let in a flood of poor dependent on the government for subsistence, doing irreparable harm to our kids future in the process. They may be OK with that, but I'm not and I don't even have any kids. This is the reason Trump resonates with the public on immigration. He has the guts to say what the politically correct say should never be said. Why? Because the Donald is there to show the shivering wet dogs in the Republican party they CAN take a stand on immigration. The immigrants who are here legally stand the most to lose if immigration continues the way it is. The more immigrants that flood in the less the legal folks can expect to make working, it's simple supply and demand. If Trump accomplishes nothing in his run for president, he will have dragged the shivering wet dogs in the Republican party back to the right. How many moderate McCain's and Romney losses will it take before the Republican party sobers up and realizes moving to the middle is killing them? If you have kids, you should be very worried about their future.
Secularists, left wingers or progressives/liberals, however you want to call them, are religious and ideological fanatics. So what if a Muslim terrorist killed American soldiers recently? To progressives or left wingers, it’s more important not to offend Islam and not to deport any radical Muslims, rather than protect American soldiers or civilians. So what if an illegal Mexican alien killed a young woman in San Francisco? She died in her father’s arms. To liberals, it’s more important not to “discriminate” against illegals and to continue to let them come here and stay here illegally, rather than protect innocent people in this country. Their religion, political correctness or secularism, requires them to do so. This is proof of ideological fanaticism, which is the same as religious fanaticism.
I can't believe how utterly weak this president is. Now executive agencies are blackmailing and holding the country ransom if their demands aren't met. Oddly liberals don't see how badly this reflects on Obama, but it simply one more instance of his lack of leadership. He should have the good graces to resign from office, he is truly pathetic...
I'm skeptical of Kate's law. Not because I don't like it, I do, but I don't think it will be enforced - how many laws do we have on illegals that are already being ignored. The only way I see this law working is if it contains a mechanism to arrest the people who willingly don't enforce it.
Reagan made that deal with Democrats and they lied. Never again. Also, she should be impeached, fired, etc... whatever it takes for refusing to do her job and uphold her constitutional duties. She is a public servant.
I'd agree, both parties are guilty. But you have to admit, it's pretty ballsey for the ICE director to refuse to do their job until a bill passes that her boss favors.
Yup - I just got through reading the text of the bill (H.R.3011) and it doesn't go nearly as far as it should. I didn't see any punishments against individual officials and/or the localities they represent that refuse to enforce the law. Evidently, public officials aren't about to force themselves to obey the law under threat of prosecution. It's no wonder the rule of law is a bad joke in this country...
Oh, I'll admit that. The problem I have with that is it's coming from the most anti-Ameican administrations I've seen in my lifetime (I'm no spring chicken) and the RNC isn't doing a damn thing to prevent this! It's like they've decided illegal support is more important than hard working (or wish they could be) American's. It's sick.
For some reason Establishment Republican Inc. thinks that they can really win Hispanics by amnesty. That's why there is such a tension in the party between the base who thinks it's nonsense and the establishment that actually believes it.
Yes, I know. It's stupid to think that but the that's what the establishment GOP thinks. I guess they have some very poor strategists. And they think they can win the next presidential election with this politically correct approach. That's very stupid.
