Judge Presiding Over Trump University Case Is Member Of La Raza Lawyers Group Read m

Don't hold your breath. The willful conflation of La Raza Unida and the bar organization just shows the rank dishonesty they have to resort to in order to save face.

Same old, same old....

 

Please show where they link to the La Raza Unida Party.

 

Its all about how the uberliberal Left works. If they can't (*)(*)(*)(*) you any other way they use some stinking (*)(*)(*)(*)ing liberal judge to do it. There aren't may ways left to deal with these people but you can forget about the courts and judges. The Left took those over a long time ago.

 

Please show where they link to the La Raza Unida Party.

 

So moving the goal posts yet again? Whats next wanting them linked to yet another La Raza group to prove your *point*?

 

He is a crooked judge. Impeach crooked judges - should happen all the time. His racism just indicates an intellectual handicap.

 

So you have established no substantial connection whatsoever between this guy and the organization you are maligning. Yes, I have it. And please don't lecture people about adult behavior until you can make it through an entire post without slinging childish insults.

 

http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/uhic/Ref...1909004&jsid=486dc3fe5f155a81a4b811563bc3a729

Go on down to where the La Raza Unidos section, the group you claim they are not a part of. You can read the whole thing and realize all the La Razas mentioned are all connected to each other.

I'll await your coming denial.

 

Once more the philosophy of La Raza itself is the link and the
common denominator here. It's what links La Raza Unida and La Raza Lawyers, as if you didn't know. Your disingenuous denials are sadly pathetic.

 

He should at the very least follow judicial ethics and recluse himself. The system does not work if there is any hint of bias in the judges.

 

The judge is not on trial, but if "crooked" upsets your equilibrium and rocks your sensibilities, why the (*)(*)(*)(*) would you support a crumb such Trump? Seriously.

 

Lol, so you haven't been paying attention to this discussion. At all. My goal posts have remained the same. I have repeatedly called out your shell game. This is the exact same issue I pointed out the last time you tried to pull the "They link to La Raza!" fallacious point.

My point is that there is no one overarching La Raza group. There are several. When you use one to malign another, I ask for your evidence that they are connected. Pointing out that they link to yet a third group does not do anything to prove that group one and two are related.



Group 1 is racist!
How do you know?
Because Group 2 said something racist!
Are Group 1 and Group 2 related?
Yes!
How do you know?
Because Group 1 links to Group 3 on their website!

 

It's right there on the website, home page. No spin whatsoever.

Which La Raza? La Raza Unida, the organization you are thinking of, is not listed in the community group. The organization called National Counsel of La Raza is not the same as La Raza Unida.

 

Please list one element of the philosophy that you are criticizing and that you can demonstrate both groups share. See if you can get through the next one with a little bit more in the way of facts and a little bit less in the way of insults.

 

http://larazalawyers.net/id3.html

Links to..

You guessed it..

http://www.nclr.org/

They are not connected though!!!

Forget that Soros donated 100 million since 1997 to these groups... I'm sure that all the Soros led media outfits are posting the complete truth about them.. And people who do nothing but read such sites are being honest as well /facepalm

 

Indeed I have. Over and over again. Your denials just represent absurd unsubstantiated claims made solely to prop up an intellectually empty argument. That's your problem...not mine.

Have what? Got the plain obvious connection here? No. You have not. You can't afford to admit it.

I am supposed to ignore your willfully deceitful attempts to deny the La Raza links of certain groups and their common philosophy? I'm sure you'd love that. Not going to happen. Or do you think the term La Raza is just coincidental with no political implications at all?

 

Wow. That's some amazing desperation and flailing around right there.

You saying it's the link is simply more of your overactive imagination and attempts to distract from the fact you were caught red-handed lying about the San Diego group.

No wonder you're never taken seriously around here.

 

So, when you see the title called "The Gay Divorcee," you are thinking that it literally means a movie about two men getting a divorce?

Actually, if you read the information on National Counsel for La Raza, first you would know that they want immigration reform but not the immigration reform that immigration restrictionist organizations are wanting, which is zero immigration, legal or illegal.

PS, the only ones who are being anti American are the so called conservatives on this forum. This includes you Geddon. Guilty by association and using the type of tactics that Stalin would use to squelch his opposition.

 

LOL! When am I supposed to have endorsed Trump? I have stated repeatedly that I would only support a candidate with a credible detailed plan to reduce, even slightly, the size power and cost of government.

I have not supported any candidate so far. I have defended Sanders and Trump when they have been subjected to frivolous irrelevant political attacks.

They are the antiestablishment candidates. A vote for either of them can be easily justified. Active support? Of course not.

 

Certainly! Reconquista is the simple one word phrase that sums up the goals of all La Raza affiliated groups.
And the La Raza lawyers serve this political and social goal by representing in our judicial system all sorts of legal maneuvering that serves that goal.
I don't know how to make it more simple or succinct than that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconquista_(Mexico)

 

What the link say? Whats the bolded title?

 

Sorry. You had your little moment. Back into the deep freeze you go where your trolling
can't be addressed because it is ignored.

 

Pity you don't have the sack to address the fact that you've been caught, time and again, in rank dishonesty; all you can do is sputter and wheeze.

 

Okay, so far so good. You've listed one element of the philosophy you are criticizing. Now for part two: demonstrate that both groups share Reconquista as part of their philosophy. I'll give you La Raza Unida, now how about this bar association?

 

You ask the impossible of the incapable, I fear.

Some people are simply immune to rationality and facts to them, to say nothing of honesty, is like Kryptonite.