Losers Who Won't Lose: What Are The Odds Of A Successful Hillary Recount?

`
Whatever you want to believe is OK with me.

 

Shrinks neatly explain it like this..-

RIGHT MAN/WOMAN SYNDROME
The "Right Men" are domestic household tyrants who terrorise their families but they can be found in all fields of life: in business, politics, art, culture.
They are poor communicators, appalling listeners, tend to see everything in "black and white" and demonstrate a profound inflexibility.
As a result, they tend to be hopelessly out of date with the current times in terms of fashion, relationships, social and cultural trends.
They also often carry an erroneously fixed and out-of-date view about whom a person is and there is nothing that person (whether it be their son/daughter, neighbour, colleague) can do to convince them otherwise.
The "Right Man" thinks he's right because he carries "secret knowledge".
The "Right Man" tends to believe that he knows people better than they know themselves.
Their catch-phrase is: "There is nothing wrong with me; it is everyone else that is at fault."
The "Right Man" must always have his way and is afraid of losing face above all ("How dare you talk to me this way?"): anything that might be an indication of his/her infallibility or erroneous ways is something that he can never admit.
And if things don't exactly go his way, he may try to scare people into submission by breaking into outbursts of rage"
http://www.23nlpeople.com/treatment/anger-hypnotherapy-nlp.html

 

Yes, there's that. But Stein has made this known, so anybody crazy enough to donate to this cause (I understand that she's already raised over $6M) has got to already be a few fries short of a happy meal...

 

She is trying to stem the flood of refund demands.

 

Donald Trump may as well demand a recount of California and New York state, it would be just as political, just as asinine and just as pointless as what Stein and Clinton are doing.

 

Well played sir.

 

Go for it.

 

LOL!!! Hardly. In Ca, Hillary won by 30%, in NY, 21%. In Michigan, Trump is winning by 0.3%, in WI, 0.8%, in Pa, 0.9%.

And you can't see the difference; eyes closed?

 

Obama still says Trump is president and is not supporting the recounts. Trump has more than 20,000 votes in Wisconsin. The outcome will not change. Jill raising 6 million dollars in a single day is a joke. You people do not want to accept the realization that for the next 4 years Trump is our president. Time to wake up everyone.

 

Once the numbers of the win reach 4 digits the percents don't matter...

Seriously, why waste the money on a lost cause....The Czar is not coming back, the South won't rise again and Clinton will never, ever be president.

 

We DID defeat Trump by any system that makes sense, unfortunately we have one that doesn't. And we're not the ones who Politico said were lying 71% of the time, nor did we call the media in for a dressing down because we didn't like their reporting

 

If a recount resulted in hillary being sworn in, I can assure you that this country would experience a civil war.

Personally, I think that this money came from Hillary because she knows she's going to prison if she isn't made president, so it's pulling out all the stops. No amount of money is too much for that.

and that is why this is happening. Nothing to do with actually thinking the votes were miscounted, and everything to do with not wanting to go to prison.

 

See thats where you guys go all nutter. No, no you didnt win, in fact it wasnt even close. Trump was factually at 57% . Our nation is made up of 50 separate states. We vote in 50 separate elections. Just because states like Ma and california want to let illegals into their state and vote does not mean they get to impose that unpatriotic behavior on the rest of the nation. The electoral has been in existence for how many centuries? Did you make one single post prior to nov 8th about repealing it? Because at 6pm on nov 8th lefties were gloating that they would he going to bed early once florida went to hillary. Seems you guys loved the electoral at 6pm but at 9pm...not so much. So please cite one post you made about the electoral prior to 6pm on nov 8th. If you dont have one then please explain why you are against the electoral only after you lost.

 

Now that's a swell question . I can't wait to hear this answer.

- - - Updated - - -

Realistically, Trump will probably be president for 8 years.

 

If you keep relying on left-leaning outlets to get your information you're going to continue to be confused and upset. Just because one does not understand why the electoral college exists does not mean they won the election due to one states population.

 

I don't see it changing much, Michigan could maybe considering how close it was, but the other states, it's done.

Clinton ran a laid back campaign and felt she could just coast to victory. She should have been able to learn how badly that works, from the 2008 primary, to even this years primary where she had to work to beat Sanders.

Thinking she could just rest up and let the thing run on it's own was insanity.

 

If the rules had been different the campaign strategies would have been different. You don't know what the results would have been if the Constitution specified direct election of the President.

BTW, what is wrong with criticizing the media? Especially when it is now known the media was colluding with the Democrats.

I think the media roundly deserves that criticism.

 

That is what I said about H. W. Bush when he ran for reelection. He did the same thing.

 

Kinda funny, in that both HW and Clinton had negatives, him with the no new taxes pledge and having to back track on it and her with the emails.

I actually respected HW for realizing that the budget couldn't be allowed to get out of hand and that he needed to pay off the Kuwait war. I think he was unfairly targeted over that. Also a reason to be careful about what you promise.

Though there is a big departure on Clinton knowingly running a personal email server, and HW Bush realizing he needed to break a campaign promise.

 

No comparison (or equivalency). One was a broken campaign promise and the other a criminal act.