Milo Yiannopoulos disinvited from CPAC slot amid tape controversy

Its cute that you think he didn't mean sex. His whole momnologue is about sex.

 

This is a clear violation of free speech against Milo,
or else another standard is being followed.

 

You must be an either an extreme leftist or an extreme conservative religious crazy to be so badly educated that :
A - You think it was a monolog. It was an interview. Hence the other participants in the taped conversation.

B - You think it was only about sex. The conversation is about relationships. Yiannapoulos specifically uses the term multiple times, discusses interpersonal/emotional relationship issues. The fact that he also talks about sex (which is indeed a portion of a sex-inclusive relationship) in no way implies that sex is all he is discussing. By analogy one can discuss marriage, including sex, emotional intimacy and support, and financial partnership; inclusion of sex in the conversation does not mean the conversation is only about sex.
Grow up.

C - You think of everything associated with this issue in absolute terms, and as if all those subtopics must align neatly and uniformly in only one way. The inability to deal with complexity is a pretty clear indication of emotional immaturity in addition to the aforementioned stunted intellectual development.

Intellectual problem C indicates you are probably a snowflake crybully, as opposed to a religious crazy. Which is it?

 

I hope you are being satirical of the Clinton News Network (CNN) complaining about not being invited to the Gaggle.

On this site, I can never tell.

On the off chance you are humorless, mentally stunted, or an extremist (which includes the other two):
He is still free to say what he wants, just not at CPAC. I was not invited to speak at CPAC. I still have freedom of speech.

 

Nobody on this thread has advocated or excused sex with minors. If you actually read/listen to the interview, WITHOUT ADDING YOUR OWN ASSUMED STATEMENTS TO IT, that Yiannapoulos never actually advocates for the sex.

Either you have never been in a sex-inclusive relationship, or you know that there is much more to such relationships than sex.

As people are complicated, relationships are more so. There are undeniably good things that happen in undeniably bad relationships. If this were not the case, divorcing couples would not take as long as they do trying to avoid or delay divorce.

It is called thinking. That stuff in your head is not just there to keep your ears apart.

 

Quote Originally Posted by Bluesguy View Post
I'm sorry I don't follow are you saying that children should be able to choose to have sex? Say 13 and above?

So again we should allow children to choose to have sex even at 13?

 

I gave him 13 and above so instead of sound biting it take a stab, should we as a society and as a matter of law allow 13 year olds to chooae to engage in sex. Are they mentally and emotionally capable of making that choice?

 

Awwwwwwwww, you're still lighting that twisted candle for Milo. Sooooooo cute.

 

Well, one things for sure. Milo is out of luck. Saw Rickie Martin on Jimmy Fallon the other night and he mentioned how he's engaged to a fine young man now.

Milo might just want to watch his p & q's.

 

Except the membership seems to slant very left, evidenced by the two homosexual communists I just referenced.

 

Weird that you'd say that.

http://armchairsubversive.blogspot.com/2007/05/stop-republican-pedophilia.html?m=1

 

Thanks for that random blog posting. How is what I said "weird"? I gave two well-known LGBT icons who were NAMBLA members, and neither of them were ever disavowed by the left.

 

Read the information I provided HERE.

 

So has he been deported yet? Without a job, he has no green card, so he's an "illegal"!

 

Like almost everyone on this forum the members who disagree with us about the Milo Y take down are all smart and far better informed than most people who do not engage in extended political debate.

IMO, they are just too distracted by their intense opposition to Trump and his supporters to reject any attack that they think will weaken the administration. Try not to take partisan fury personally.

 

Actually, had there been any, there would have been no sex.

 

No thanks. Random blog postings aren't very persuasive.

 

Being scared of facts is embarrassing for you.

 

I'm not sure what you blog's "facts" have to do with my comments on NAMBLA membership and the well known and respected communists who I identified as members. Maybe you can explain?

 

Its a list of known conservative child molesters. You see, I get annoyed with someone who assigns a political party as a leader in child molesting...especially you and your buddies wallow in the "libs are child molesters" bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

Child molesters should ALL be killed no matter who they voted for.

 

We are talking about a "civil rights" group that has been pushing for the abolishment of child consent laws. NAMBLA - North American Man Boy Love Association. Some very well known LGBT icons were members of this group. They have identified as communists. They are left wing. Are there any conservative icons who were members of NAMBLA? You're free to list them.

 

Keep avoiding the CONVICTED Republican child molesters. Keep focusing on only the lib ones...that's what the pub ones are counting on.

 

Were those Republican child molesters part of NAMBLA or any other pro-pedophilia group?

 

Does that really matter to you? If so, that is a blight on YOU as well.

 

It matters in the sense that I'm talking about an actual group dedicated to this purpose, who has well-known members of the left as members. Since you're trying to create a moral equivalency on the right, I'd expect to see some well-known respected right-wingers who have been as openly supportive as Harry Hay and Allen Ginsberg, yet you produce nothing.

Want to know why? Because any conservative who supported this stuff would be ostracized, like Milo was. Being a child rapist didn't stop Meryl Streep from giving a standing ovation to Roman Polanski. Being supporters of NAMBLA didn't stop Harry Hay from being the "father of gay liberation", or Allen Ginsberg from becoming personal friends with Johnny Depp and other A-list celebrities. This kind of thing doesn't necessarily stop a left-winger from being respected, like it would on the right. That really says a lot about that side of the political spectrum from my perspective.