NRA Convention Bans Guns To Protect Mike Pence. Parkland Survivors’ Jaws Drop.

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by tomander7020, Apr 29, 2018.

Tags:
  1. Lee Atwater

    Lee Atwater Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    45,979
    Likes Received:
    27,030
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    With all those "good guys" with all those guns.........what could possibly go wrong?
     
    tomander7020 and FoxHastings like this.
  2. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Can't have those dangerous guns around. Somebody could get shot
     
  3. RedDirtWalker

    RedDirtWalker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,907
    Likes Received:
    438
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Having the Vice-President as an attendant is kind of big and something they want. I would bet a requirement of him attending is no guns allowed. It may be a matter of having the Vice-President attend or not as dictated by the secret service.
     
  4. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113

    But why isn't the NRA and it's obedient minions complaining that the SS is restricting their right to tote guns...???

    Why isn't the SS being vilified like the students at Parkland were by gun toters??
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2018
  5. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well that's sort of the way the real world works, we have to be honest with ourselves here....

    Celebrities, persons in power, etc are more "exposed" so to speak, than you or I. Not saying their lives are more important or more valuable, but they are at greater risk of being a target than the average joe.

    For example during one of my combat deployments to Afghanistan I was tasked as part of the personal security detail for the Colonel. We remained by his side at all times and drove him around the battlefield in an armored convoy consisting of 5 vehicles with him in the middle. During dismounted patrols he was flanked on all sides by heavily armed troops including myself. Our job? Protect the boss at ALL COSTS, with your life if necessary. And we did.

    Is that "right" per say? Is his life more valuable than my own or any of the rest of us? I never had a personal security team follow me around the warzone to protect me. But the reality is that yeah the Colonel is a higher target than well....a junior enlisted guy which I was at the time. He is more important than I am due to his rank and position and me dying would have less of an impact than him dying for obvious reasons. So if it came down to it I was fully expected to die if necessary to ensure he did not.

    It's not to say that all life is not equally valuable but the reality is that some folks in society ARE more "valuable" than others. Heads of state such as the VP require security measures in place for obvious reasons. When I walk into a convention center for a show or something there aren't special agents running around to protect me because I'm not that important obviously.

    Point is, we can play semantics all day long, but the reality is that yes the Vice President of the United States is more "important" than "you or me" and at a MUCH GREATER risk of being attacked than either you or I. That is why you or I don't get personal security details to follow us around 24/7 while people like the VP can't visit a coffee shop to grab a drink without armed guards in sunglasses and earpieces combing the area first.

    We can pretend to live in a fantasy land where we are all equal but the reality is that no we aren't. If Nightmare515 was shot tomorrow then it would have no effect on the nation outside of those who personally know me and care about me. It might make the local papers....If the Vice President gets shot then that would have a much greater impact on the nation than the average citizen such as myself which is why much greater precautions are taken to ensure his personal safety than mine.
     
  6. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Then why isn't the SS being vilified and ridiculed like the Parkland students were by gun toters?

    Those kids who died meant more to their loved ones than Pence...
     
  7. thinkitout

    thinkitout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,897
    Likes Received:
    1,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I never even IMPLIED that it was the NRA's choice.

    Texas laws are less restrictive concerning gun free zones:

    The convention is free to attend for all NRA members and their families. The annual meeting will include firearms displays and exhibits as well as meetings, luncheons and musical performances.

    Attendees will be allowed to carry firearms in the convention center and in the Omni Dallas Hotel in accordance with state law, the NRA’s website states — but not during the forum Pence will attend. Firearms will not be sold on site, but ammunition sales are permitted.


    http://www.journalnow.com/news/nati...cle_798349b9-c839-54c1-bce5-123e98a5588d.html
     
  8. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because they have enough common sense to realize that having a bunch of firearms around someone as important as the Vice President of the United States is a whole different ballgame than allowing folks to walk around with guns in general.

    Political figures are high profile targets, they are at much greater risk of violence than every day folks. Nobody outside of this forum knows who Nightmare515 even is or what I believe in. Plus I have no power in the real world to make regulations. And nobody knows what I even look like. I can walk around a society full of armed citizens and be perfectly fine because I am not really at risk of assassination.

    Somebody like the Vice President of the United States is a bit more important and more highly exposed than I am and at much greater risk of assassination. That's why he gets a Secret Service entourage and I don't.

    I mean come on...Lets not pretend that the Vice President is the "same" as the average joe for the pure sake of being argumentative....In the real world yes there are human beings who are more important than you or I and are going to be protected better than we are due to their positions. The VP is one of them...
     
  9. AlphaOmega

    AlphaOmega Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    28,747
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yes...AND?
     
  10. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113

    I am NOT pretending that Pence is an average joe.......I am saying that IF, like the gun folks say, guns are safe/everyone should have one , then Pence has no worries.

    The gun toters sure don't feel like calling out and bullying the SS as they did school children.
     
  11. QLB

    QLB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2015
    Messages:
    11,696
    Likes Received:
    2,019
    Trophy Points:
    113

    How do you know the appearance of those "planning" to attend. Do you have a new crystal ball?
     
  12. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Still doesn't equate. Once you bring high profile personnel into the equation everything changes. Pence is a high profile person at a higher risk of violence directed towards him, so is someone like Taylor Swift.

    It's about measuring the risk analysis of the situation. Sure everybody is at some level of risk of being a victim, but high profile folks such as heads of state or celebrities are at a much greater risk than the average person for the blatantly obvious reason. Greater precautions are taken to ensure their safety due to their much greater level of exposure.

    You could replace Pence with any other famous person and I still hold the same rationale. That Justin Bieber kid is at a much greater risk of being assaulted or killed in public than an average every day guy like myself. That's why he has armed body guards who follow him around and I do not. Same with all other famous people. I doubt there's more than like 100 people in the world who even know who I am, there are hundreds of millions of people who know who these famous people are. Higher exposure, much greater risk, much greater precautions.

    Point is, I am around guns all the time. I've been to plenty of gun shows where the majority of folks walking around have rifles slung on their shoulders or pistols on their hips, as did I. Felt perfectly fine, no different than walking through the mall. I felt perfectly fine because I'm not a famous person, nobody even knows who I am. If I were a famous celebrity or political figure who's music or policies are known by millions of people who may or may not like me then I would not feel safe walking among hundreds of people with guns on their hips.

    In layman's terms, yeah guns are safe to be around unless you are someone who is famous enough to where others may want to deliberately assassinate you for some reason....
     
  13. Elcarsh

    Elcarsh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2014
    Messages:
    2,636
    Likes Received:
    396
    Trophy Points:
    83
    If he is that exposed to danger, shouldn't there be as many good guys with a gun as possible on site to ensure his safety?
     
  14. thinkitout

    thinkitout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,897
    Likes Received:
    1,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    . . . . But your narrative carries the implication that human lives have a finite value, since they vary in importance. I am sure that the parents of the Parkland victims do not share your perspective, which certainly does not support the concept of equality.

    I support the 2nd Amendment, but I wish that gun owners would acknowledge that these are deadly instruments, and regulations to avoid mass casualties should not be dismissed without at least considering them. Gun owners have rights, but should endangered individuals remain silent???
     
  15. thinkitout

    thinkitout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,897
    Likes Received:
    1,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is that the best rebuttal you could construct??? Never mind.
     
  16. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,640
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Indeed - liberal nutcases have proven themselves to be quite dangerous. Best we don't let them have guns at all, much less where a Republican VP might be,
     
  17. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They DO.

    It sounds harsh and we all love to pretend like that isn't true but yes it is.

    My own parents don't share that perspective, nobody's actual family or friends share that perspective obviously but it doesn't make it any more or less true. Yeah I am more important to my own family and friends than someone like Pence or Trump, but those two guys, like it or not, are more valuable to the nation than Nightmare515 is....

    If Mike Pence and I were both kidnapped and there was only the option to save one of us then guess who is getting left to die. I'll give you a hint, it won't be the Vice President of the United States....

    Sort of like how my truck got blown up in war while being out front of the Colonel's truck. Why? Because the Colonel is more important than some junior enlisted Soldier is. We can spin it any way we want, the bottom line is simple, the life of a Colonel is more valuable due to their position and rank than the life of a Private. That's why a decade ago my truck got blown up with a chemical bomb instead of the Colonels. They put me out front for that very reason alone. So I get blown up by bombs instead of him. To my family and friends I am more important than him. To the US military he is much more important than I. So, in layman's terms, if somebody has to die, they'd much rather it be me than him, so I got sent out front of him.

    That's how the real world works, I live in the real world. Yes there are people who are more important to society than I am, there are people in greater danger than I am due to their positions or fame.

    It sounds almost comical but lets be honest here. If a doomsday meteorite was coming like we see in the movies and there is only a limited amount of space in underground bunkers to save a limited number of people then guess who the government is going to grab first? Once again I'll give you a hint, it ain't gonna be a mid grade US Army guy who volunteers as a mod on a political forum...

    Why? Because in the grand scheme of things, while I may be important to my own family and friends, there are plenty of people in our society who "matter" a whole hell of a lot more than I do.

    Philosophically are we all equal as human beings? Yes
    Realistically are we all equal as human beings? Hell no
     
  18. Grau

    Grau Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    9,116
    Likes Received:
    4,260
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Additionally, not all of the "Parkland Survivors" are supportive of more gun control and MSM ignores some of those same kids who are supportive of the 2nd Amendment like Kyle Kashuv.
     
    SiNNiK likes this.
  19. thinkitout

    thinkitout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,897
    Likes Received:
    1,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Even considering your own perspective concerning prioritization, that is still no reason to minimize the value of other lives, which certainly cannot be considered insignificant. True patriots consider and defend the rights of others, regardless of their station.

    Not striving for improvement defines mediocrity, and devaluing human lives defines apathy.
     
  20. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113

    You keep repeating yourself about how guns are ONLY dangerous around "important" people.... so I will ,too. :


    FoxHastings said:
    I am NOT pretending that Pence is an average joe.......I am saying that IF, like the gun folks say, guns are safe/everyone should have one , then Pence has no worries.

    The gun toters sure don't feel like calling out and bullying the SS as they did school children.
     
  21. Maccabee

    Maccabee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    8,901
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Simple. Secret Service requires it.
     
  22. AlphaOmega

    AlphaOmega Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    28,747
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    its not a rebuttal. We are waiting for your point. The NRA doesnt decide to carry guns when it comes to the security of the VP. Every PF member should know this. You are about to tell us if you understand that or not. If you now get it, youre welcome.
     
    SiNNiK likes this.
  23. Tim15856

    Tim15856 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2016
    Messages:
    7,792
    Likes Received:
    4,229
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So when NRA members accept some sort of limitation you guys complain? Unlike you, we live in the real world and know there are limits to our rights. We know there are places we can't carry our firearms, the list is easily obtained. Then there are private property issues where stores or other places have no gun policies. We don't scream at the sky about these property owners, if we feel strongly about it, we just don't go there at all.
     
  24. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FoxHastings said:
    But why isn't the NRA and it's obedient minions complaining that the SS is restricting their right to tote guns...???

    Why isn't the SS being vilified like the students at Parkland were by gun toters??


    I'm not complaining about the NRA finally using some common sense, it happens so seldom.

    I AM pointing out their hypocrisy about accepting a gun ban when they declare that guns are SAFE...:)






    Who is "we" ...please speak for yourself without needing backup.

    If you mean gun toters , NO, they do not know there are limits to their rights, they believe everyone and anyone can own any kind of gun and as many as they want.






    Oh, it's nice to know "we" knows enough to stay away from places that are so dangerous, like libraries and hospitals, that if they can't be armed they won't go there. (good, nobody misses "we" )

    :) Well, you didn't mention why the SS isn't vilified like students were....but the answer is clear...a bully always instinctively knows who won't take their crap....

    Good to see gun toters so humbled and obedient to the Secret Service...:)
     
  25. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So since you are so correct, go correct the secret service. Give it a try.
     

Share This Page