Michael Flynn documents released

Strzok, Flynn interviewer, fired for unseemly conduct.

Dirty Peter Strzok’s Phones Scrubbed AFTER He Was Fired — Happy Horndog Page’s Phone Scrubbed and Concealed for ENTIRE YEAR before It Was Turned Over

Dirty Bob defied the Court and refused to furnish Dirty Peter's contemporaneous 302.

 

Footnote in Dirty Bob Mueller’s Filing About a Mysterious FBI Interview With Dirty Peter Strzok Raises Questions
.

Dirty Peter and Dirty Bob (file photo)
.​

Special Counsel Dirty Bob Mueller filed his memo responding to Flynn at the Friday afternoon deadline and it confirmed General Flynn was set up.

Dirty Bob Mueller defied The Court and withheld the original 302 report on Flynn which was taken by Special Agent Joe Pientka and Dirty Peter Strzok in January of 2017.

Instead, Dirty Bob Mueller cited a 302 interview with Dirty Peter Strzok taken on July 19, 2017 about the ambush interview he had with General Flynn earlier that year.

Dirty Bob Mueller redacted the name of the other FBI agent who was with Strzok interviewing Flynn — even though everyone knows that it’s Joe Pientka.

The missing original 302 report on Flynn immediately raised red flags — but an interesting footnote in Dirty Bob Mueller’s filing is raising even more questions.

According to a footnote (screenshot below), Dirty Peter Strzok was also interviewed on July 19th, 2017 (4 days after his paramour Happy Horndog Lisa Page was removed from Mueller’s investigation) “in relation to other matters, not as part of the investigation of Flynn or any investigation of Strzok’s conduct.”

Why did FBI agents interview Strzok?? He was fired just a few days later, but the interview was not about his conduct.



WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL 302 REPORT ON FLYNN??

 

Righties wanna argue minutiae but won’t ask the obvious question of Flynn...Why did he feel the need to lie?

 

Zorro, why did Flynn lie?

Zorro, why did Flynn plead guilty?

 

1) he didn’t according to the FBI agents who questioned him.

2) mueller threatened his family

 

That was the opinion of the first two agents who interviewed Flynn, which opinion turned out to be incorrect.

Mueller used what he had to make Flynn tell the truth.

 

1) the opinions of the people they actually spoke to him.

2) agreed that mueller used what he could to get Flynn to say his truth. Ie he threatened his family

 

cause like another said, Trump supporters do not care, they know their party is corrupt and just do not care

"GOP shrugs at Trump's involvement in Cohen crimes"

https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/10/politics/michael-cohen-congress-republicans/index.html

 

You are on the wrong topic. There are several Cohen topics, this one is about Flynn.

Dirty Bob Mueller blew the Flynn case

Dirty Bob released key documents relating to the FBI’s questioning of former national security adviser Michael Flynn, confirming agents did not believe at the time Flynn intentionally lied to them -- though he was later charged with making false statements in that interview.

Dirty Bob Mueller had a bad day on Wednesday when federal Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered him to release all exculpatory evidence that could clear General Flynn.



The documents also reveal that the decision to interview Flynn in early 2017 about contacts with the Russian ambassador was controversial within the Justice Department. One FBI document said then-Acting Attorney General Sally Yates “was not happy” when then-FBI Director James Comey informed her that the FBI planned to talk to Flynn. The report also said several unnamed people back at FBI headquarters 'later argued about the FBI’s decision to interview Flynn.'"

Sullivan was the judge who threw out the conviction of Senator Ted Stevens because federal prosecutors withheld evidence that cleared Stevens.

Now Mueller has done the same thing.

In defiance of a direct order from the Court, Dirty Bob has refused to turn over the 302's from the Flynn interview, the only contemporaneous record the FBI has of Flynn's statements in the interview.

Another 302 report stated that Strzok and the other agent 'both had the impression at the time that Flynn was not lying or did not think he was lying.'

The report described Flynn as 'unguarded,' saying he 'clearly saw the FBI agents as allies.' It also stated Flynn discussed a number of 'various subjects,' including things like hotels stayed in during the campaign, Trump’s 'knack for interior design' and other issues unrelated to their inquiry.

"'Flynn was so talkative, and had so much time for them, that Strzok wondered if the national security adviser did not have more important things to do than have a such a relaxed, non-pertinent discussion with them,' it said."

This puts the conversation in a whole different light. There was no investigation of President Trump at the time. General Flynn thought he was shooting the breeze with FBI agents, whom he saw as fellow good guys.

The only thing he is guilty of is gullible enough to trust Corrupt Comey's FBI.

Dity Bob Mueller is Corrupt Comey's mentor.

https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2018/12/mueller-blew-flynn-case.html#more

 

Comey sent Strzok to gather evidence ... case closed. Search warrants and Miranda aren't optional.

 

No ... police must Mirandize "suspects" whenever said "suspects" answers may incriminate the target of the police interrogation. The 4 th & 5 th amendments are protected by the Miranda decision. Comey's FBI committed the most reprehensible abuses imaginable, and everyone who took part should be jailed.

 

Total nonsense........lying to the FBI is a crime period. Flynn was DNI, he simply knew better. Pls, cut the nonsense out.

 

Lying to the FBI is a process crime not illegal collusion with russia to steal the 2016 election from obama and hillary

Libs got nuthin’

 

It is. Keep denying.

 

Take your own advice. Miranda sole purpose is to legally compel the police to abide by the 4th & 5th amendment provisions. Yates wanted to prosecute Flynn for Logan Act violations ... Comey / McCabe sent Strzok to collect evidence. No warrant, no Miranda. Dirty cops doing dirty deeds that violate the most significant aspects of American rights to due process. Lock them up.

 

Lying to the FBI is a felony........Flynn is not above the law nor the oath he swore to.

 

Why would Flynn need to be Mirandised? Flynn knew lying to the FBI was a crime under oath or not........you are reaching for straws while drowning in nonsense.

 

Flynn ... like every American ... needed to be Mirandized because IT IS THE LAW. Yates, Comey, McCabe, and Strzok intentionally broke THE LAW. Miranda guarantees Americans advised of their constitutional rights to silence, and legal representation. Comey BRAGGED that incriminating admissions were obtained because of Flynn & the new admins NAIVETE. Clearly demonstrating the FBI interrogation was intentionally orchestrated to deprive Flynn of his 5th amendment rights. Comey: We wouldn't have GOTTEN AWAY WITH IT ... " Newsflash ... you didn't get away with it Jim Jim ::

 

The right does not care how many crimes Trump may have been involved with, they just do not care as the link I posted shows

 

if it was, you would of shown a link, but oh well

 

If you are just questioned, Miranda rights are not relevant. One can just plead the 5th, or even simpler, call an attorney. I have had personal experience in the matter.

Trump supporters making up law and reality.

 

If flynn lied it had nothing to do with trump-russia collusion

And I dont even know if flynn lied

 

Only when the "suspect" is in custody, which you seem to be implying knowledge of with the word "interrogation". Flynn was NOT in custody.

 

He wasn't asked to tell the truth as it wasn't official questioning.
I have no obligation to tell the truth to anyone in the setting of a personal conversation.
Sorry you have to be wrong, again

 

During official questioning which this was not