Fox's Rachel Campos-Duffy Jokes About Violent Attack on Ex-Speaker's Husband: 'Maybe Paul Pelosi Nee

He would be more likely to add them to the Kennedy Center Honors list, dirtying up another long respected American institution.

 

Uh ... no, please. That's called censorship. Who gets to decide what's ethical or not? Let's leave that can of worms unopened.

 

Gallows humor?

You have a point. If she was really going for a shamelessness award, she should have added that.

 

Speaking only for myself, as much as I abhor Trump, someone hammering him would not be amusing at all.

 

Yeah, because the violent MAGA right thinks attacking 80 year old mean for political reasons is hilarious.

 

Well maga certainly eats that stuff like candy.

 

No they would have your post deleted.

 

Isn’t this the chick who dated or wanted to date Puck?? lol her judgement in all things is highly suspect

 

I finally saw what she said and my only thought, these people have children.

 

No one is falling for the democrat moral shame, its just fun to watch you all take a high ground with so many skeletons in your closets.

 

You feel no moral shame in laughing at an old man who was violently attacked with a hammer. Noted, and that actually proves my point perfectly.

 

Not a bit. None of you do either, many liberals just get off on trying to get other people to apologize to them. They love being a victim of something!

 

Perhaps I missed it, but did the left make fun of the gun who was shot? That would be an appropriate comparison.

 

Then you and I have very different moral compasses.
I tend to think it is distasteful to laugh at the misfortune of others, and particularly not at those who have been victims of a violent attack.
If you think others are as morally bankrupt as you, you are just projecting.

 

Right, one of us pretends like they have a moral high ground (you) and the other doesn't get their panties in a twist over random talk show host jokes (Me). Carry forward with your shame campaign that no one is going to see or care about lol.

 

Which is worse, a hammer comment or wanting someone dead?

Video at the below link.

 

Just a joke that offends those with delicate as a flower sensibility.

 

Was just reading about this ad
Alex Thompson on X: "Trump’s Super PAC is running this ad in rural Georgia counties targeting Black men. https://t.co/mcRMkGsqLN" / X (twitter.com)
being censored by google
Trump: Still Too Hot to Handle | Power Line (powerlineblog.com)
We just dont know if was the lefties at google, all in for Biden, that decided to censor the ad or if it was the lefties in Bidens DOJ, FBI or CIA, that decided it needs to come down and pressed google to take it down. Either way its the lefties who get to decide.

 

Jen Psaki went on Morning Joe this morning to fantasize about all the ways Donald Trump can be taken off the chess board:
"Maybe Donald Trump will go away. Maybe he'll go to jail. Maybe he will die. Not to be too morbid. But maybe. He's not a young man."
__________

Whatabout, Whatabout, Whatabout...
Psaki isn't the subject of this thread, but MSNBC is free to fire her at any ime...
Now...Back ON-TOPIC:
Campos-Duffy is a complete idiot...
However, at Faux, such comments will probably warrant a healthy raise...

 

Well, Paul Pelosi's gay lovers fight with his boyfriend is pretty funny...lol

 

Sounds GOOD!

 

That was a nasty thing to say out loud on a public cable show. She should know better. But shouldn't Campos-Duffy know better as well? I'm not sure I see the difference. The only people who joke about Paul Pelosi's attack probably wish him dead at worst, or don't care about a left winger getting bashed at best.

This bit of whataboutism does not excuse Fox News or Campos-Duffy.

 

Do we need some cheese to go with that whine?

Google is a giant, capitalist corporation. They do what they see fit according to their bottom line, just like any other American corporation. It matters very little which way those at the top swing politically. It's always about the money.

 

Yeah, I didnt believe their claim that it was “removed for a policy violation.” Federal regulators can wreck their "bottom line".

 

Some people's high moral ground is simply deleting posts they don't agree with.