2O twisters hit 7 red states

OK, so the takeaway from this thread and other recent threads about natural disaters is that according to people on the right making a poorly expressed joke about a natural disaster is bad (I'll go with poor taste), but blaming a natural disaster on Jews or claiming it is god's judgement is fine.

Good to know.

 

Stick to your day job. Comedian you ain’t.

 

Tornadoes have been around since weather began.

If California gets struck by an earthquake it's not punishment from God.

Also they're wildfires quite frequently there too.

 

That's just as dumb as the concept of that tornadoes are karma. Karma is not real.

 

No we're better than them. They'll have our sympathy and our charity.

 

Nope it's equally dumb. Blaming it on this God or that God that doesn't matter. If you call your God climate change it's the same level of nonsense.

 

Ok, so you are alt-right then. "Jews will not replace us" eh?

I'd be lying if I said I was a Democrat. I have no reason to do that.

Now THAT is a lie. The irony.....LOL

Intelligence....LOL. I guess you like being lied to, which is not surprising considering who your political idol is.

 

Share a single post where you are critical of a democrat position. Just one.

 

I'm pro-life. I believe abortion & death penalty are State issues. I oppose student loan forgiveness. I oppose gun bans. I supported Nikki Haley. I wanted Biden to quit the race, and still do. I have said building a wall is not a money issue, so they could build it. I do not believe the trans should be allowed to play in girls teams. Etc, etc, etc.

Which Democrat positions do you claim I support?

Just because I think Tump is an meowing idiot, and I don't parrot conspiracy theories doesn't mean I am a registered Dem. I have never been a Dem, so it's an inane claim to make, especially when it can't be proven.

 

Another Independent! Progress.

”Be therefore like the bow of a boat that cleaves the water, yet leaves in its wake, water unbroken” Master Po to Grasshopper -- I think.

 

Your refusal to see the obvious is legendary. The florida case is on indefinite hold due to either prosecutorial fraud or incompetence. Fani has Defrauded the voters in fulton county and is under investigation for doing so, and some one else is likely to be handed that case and upon examining the extraordinarily novel legal theories upon which it is based is almost certain to drop it. If Trump gets even partial immunity most of the DC case dies. In New York, so far we don't have testimony that Trump ever even signed off on the NDA, your star witness Stormy who owes trump a scandalous amount of money for lies she's told about him already rather than testifying to any of the crimes charged, came up with a whole new case which has absolutely nothing to do with this case, and on top of which denied that the money she received from Cohen was for an NDA but instead claimed it was for other services rendered about which the less said the better. And no claim was made as to who those services were rendered. The last hope for the prosecution is now Cohen. And lots of luck getting anyone to buy any thing the convicted liar has to say.

 

Your use of "red" in the title was inappropriate.

 

OFFs.

Apparently you missed the fact that tornados, hurricanes, etc., have been fodder for, in a light hearted sense, for comedy a number of times in the annals of comedic history.

I'll look for your letter of outrage to the directors/producers, actors, script writers of sharknados.

Since poisonous snakes/big snakes kill people, I'll look for your letter of outrage to directors/producers, actors, script writers of 'snakes on a plane'

Since bad guys with guns kill people, I look for your letter of outrage to all the comedic films, skits, books, comics, etc. ,making light of bad guys with guns.

Your fake outrage, noted.

Apparently you didn't get the memo that there is no greater stench than that hypocritical self-righteous indignation

Get off that lofty perch, it's nauseating.

 

Just keep making excuses for such a low class gutter attempt at so-called humor.

You'll notice that this thread isn't working out very well for you

 

Whatever

 

I was kidding. I should have thought 'in all seriousness' would have tipped you off.

 

Weasel words are not an argument.

Not according to Cannon. You're making sh*t up.

No, she's under attack by partisans who can't handle the fact that their nominee is a criminal, sex abuser, con man, frauster, pervert.

so they've been saying in the right wing echo chamber.

They can remove her but they can't stop the wheels of justice already in motion, without just cause made to an appellate court, and that requires proof, noting that the proof is in DA's favor.

He might get immunity for acts conducted in the foreign areas, but not domestically. The cornerstone of American law is 'no man is above the law', and they would have to demonstrate how what would be a crime for anyone else would not be a crime for the president, because the cornerstone principal does not allow for exceptions for higher station.

Doesn't matter, he reimbursed Cohen for his payment to Stormy, meaning that Cohen was a conduit for a payment designed to keep her quiet, which she did, keep quiet. All that has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt is that that contention is accurate, and the evidence for it is quite strong, given Testimonies from AMI execs, and others, not to mention the documents themselves

It's attorney's fees for a lawsuit she lost. She sued for defamation, and the jury disagreed, which does not establish that she lied about Trump. That's not scandalous and it's irrelevant to the case.

she cleared that one up because she said the only reason she signed the NDA due to intimidation, she feared for her safety. that's logical, since a threat on her life was made.

In criminal cases, prosecution has to rely on testimony from witnesses with shady history, this is common, the question of truthfulness, therefore, has to be corroborated. There is considerable corroboration from other credible witnesses and then there are the documents that also corroborate.

The case against Trump is strong.

And, you are wrong.

 

Were they, the states listed in the ARTICLE, or were they not, red states? Yes or no?

Your inference was premature, as the content of the post made it clear it was a light hearted, in the spirit of jest, post.

You really need to chill out.

 

Even bad humor is better than no humor at all.

I have been through more hurricanes than I can count, and some humor never hurt me.

 

Well right after the in all seriousness part you were gloating about people losing homes and lives because of the political trend in the state.

Before you said that your post was funny after you said that you showed yourself to be overly partisan and evil.

Let's put it this way if your house burns down or you lose loved ones in California I won't go out because you're a Democrat. But then again I'm a human being.

 

What a pant load. Read the info the FBI clearly screwed the pooch during the raid on Maralago. Fani paid her lover a guy that's never even seen a rico case from either side millions to head the investigation. If you don't see fraud in that you are blinded by the Trump hate. She is being investigated for ripping off fulton county and your weasel words concerning the investigators don't matter a damn. It is always at the discretion of the prosecutor whether or not to pursue a case.

 

Stop it..

 

Chill out

 

There was no raid. A federal judge signed off on the search warrant.Trump was obstructing the government's effort to retrieve government documents

No jury would ever buy the argument that she was paying him for anything.

He's a highly competent and qualified attorney but he's off the case so your concern is moot

Trump has a history of fraud. Having contempt for trump is reasonable given his history of fraud, perversion, and crimes

She hasn't ripped off anyone, please try being truthful.

Please learn what the phrase "Weasel Word" means --you have not used it correctly

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_word
[/QUOTE]
It is always at the discretion of the prosecutor whether or not to pursue a case.[/QUOTE]

Well now, you finally said something that's correct-- unbelievable!

 

It is always at the discretion of the prosecutor whether or not to pursue a case.[/QUOTE]

Well now, you finally said something that's correct-- unbelievable![/QUOTE]
Call it what ever you will the fact is the FBI fabricated evidence. That's in the documents the Judge unredacted.
Competent and highly paid but not his area of expertise. The moral equivalent of Hiring an herpetologist to do brain surgery.
All of that is of course predicated upon ones willingness to believe leftist lies.
She has try looking at the facts.
Then neither have you.