Christmas in Palestine

Quite right margot ,

see :

http://www.politicalforum.com/lates...lehem-fear-israeli-expansion.html#post4879011


.

 

How many christians will egyptian muslim filth murder and ethnically cleanse today?

 

Three and a half by teatime.

 

Thanks moon I needed that.

It reminds me of being reminded of the plight of Christians in Palestine by the "African American" brother of a Palestinian, back when "Christians" were the biggest terrorists from Palestine, when there actually were quite a few more Christians there then; I remember the other two standing there, one had a copy of Mein Kampf in his roll-away, the other was a Kleagle. Too bad it has a counterpart, however missing the French:

“Ownership of land

In Islam there are three kinds of land from the stand‑point of ownership:



(1) Lands owned by society

(2) Lands owned by State

(3) Lands owned by private individuals



Lands owned by society

This kind of lands is not salable. Even the State has no right to sell them. Lands developed and tilled by human hands and those which come under Muslim control conse(*)quent on jihad are considered to be the property of the Muslim society and none can purchase or sell even one metre thereof.“

http://www.al-islam.org/philosophyofislam/17.htm

Now for a little humor:

"It is the duty of the followers of other religions to stop disputing the sovereignty of Islam in this region," (legitimately elected Palestinian sovereignty)

"I support the abolition of all political borders." (moon)
http://www.politicalforum.com/lates...her-palestinian-hate-crime-8.html#post3767831

Since the legitimate elected Palestinian sovereignty is Islam, therefore, Islam is political, consequently, moon supports abolition of Islam and Palestinian sovereignty.

*****

As soon as Islam is no longer a sovereignty over the land we will have better ethical arguments against those Jews and their racist God.

 

Did you arrive at these inane conclusions during one of those special moments alone ?

 

Not that this is anything new. Muslims have been killing Christians since the creation of the religion. They've been burning churches and building mosques right on top of the Holy ground of other religions for hundreds of years. There is always somewhere on Earth where the religion of peace is making war on non-muslims. The reason we are having the conflict even now is that muslims invaded from Saudi Arabia. That is why we had the Crusades. Muslims attacked Christians visiting the Holy Land. The obvious solution is to get the Muslims out of the Holy Land and Palestine. They can't live peacefully, they need to go somewhere else.

 

I would have gotten naked for it and masturbated to an image of Aisha, but someone would have accused me of being a child molester, and they might have mistaken it for a cartoon of MoHamMad and then they would have went out and killed some cartoonists or newspaper readers.

The conclusion is not devoid of intelligence, it is the lack of balance that has prolonged the lack of applied ethics. The lack of balance sometimes gets people to choose which side they prefer.

"Did he [MoHamMad's ambassador] say to the Christian [Heraclius] embrace faith, or embrace Islam?"

The ethical argument for removing the rights of those Jews from having the land, because God gave it to them, is for all intents and purposes canceled out by the equal and opposite force. Simply to make the ethic argument against the Jews, which can be done now without any help, would just give the land to Islam. For the argument to be "better," to be acceptable and lacking the bias of choosing sides, it needs to have nothing canceling it out.

When so-called "Palestinians" stop supporting and voting for race and religion having sovereignty over land, the purely ethical arguments for the "consent of the governed" instantly take on greater weight and become "better."

 

The Zionists' brutality and lack of compassion or respect for the law has led to a situation wherein I wouldn't let them squat on Mars, let alone in Palestine and I'm very much aware that , outside of the sphere of the US of AIPAC, that's a sentiment shared by billions of other people.

 

You forgot to include the EU as one of the spheres in which Israel is considered a legitimate state with a right to exist. I understand that Britain is still a member.

 

(*)(*)(*)(*) Palestine. (*)(*)(*)(*) Islam. But not Christianity. The Christians should be transfer to Israel.

 

LOLOLOL.. you are a riot.

The Crusaders killed Jews all along the route to the Holy Land..

Do you ever study history?

 

The plonker obviously ha'nt a clue abt Middle eastern history apart from what his Zionist indoctrinations taught him/her.


...

 

Why is it that we never hear of any other state eternally *itching on about its "right to exist " ?

Surely it socalled "existence or non-existence " doesnt depend on others - does it ? It either exist or NOT within defined border , which Israel have so far failed to defined.. Some Zionists claim Greater Israel to be from the sea to the river - which river ? the Jordan or Euphrates ?


BTW - do you consider that PALESTINE HAVE A RIGHT TO EXIST ? and the Palestinian non-Jews have a right to self determination - FREE/LIBERATED from Israeliu military occupation ?


....

 

The requisite personal attack from this poster when confronted with yet another of its contradictory and moronic posts.

Nothing to add as usual.

 

How come we never hear of other states whose right to exist is questioned every day? How come muslim fascist chimps like those running iran and syria get to threaten israel with destruction, yet some mentally ill muslim supporting posters here always fail to recognize how that is a violation of the UN charter?

 

Yes I did. did you? They went to the Holy Land to fight Muslim Turks. They didn't go to fight Jews.

 

Yes indeed, they just killed jews as an afterthought. Something to amuse them on the long journey.

Time to step back from your belligerent feelings.

Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy Hannukkah.