Dismissing any and all of what they are saying on those grounds, as you are doing, is self-stupefying as it automatically blocks you from...
The graph tells us that droughts as a whole are on the decline which I thought you would welcome as good news. The decline in droughts is probably...
I tend not to trust NASA partly because they’re a government institution and are politically-subservient to the US government but mainly because I...
Those projections in the graph above are virtually all of the instrumental ECSs between 2002 and 2020 that I could find and show an ECS mostly...
Well Ok, I suppose this discussion can go no further if you completely trust scientists without any independent investigation for yourself. But,...
Below is a collection of ECS studies with estimates ranging from 4.5C to under 0.5C. These are instrumental ESC studies (i.e. things like...
Their best estimate for ECS is about 3C and has been for about 20 years: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/figures/chapter-1/figure-1-16 [ATTACH]
One study published in the Food and Chemical Toxicology journal (Stephanie Seneff et al 2022) might support what you say:...
I agree that AGW is real, but when I say "AGW" I'm referring to the IPCC's stance on AGW and their estimate of 3C for ECS.
I have been reseraching this topic for a while. Yes, I have seen the correlation between CO2 and temperature. Perhaps you think that proves AGW, I...
I haven’t seen any such evidence from these agencies. I have yet to see evidence supporting the IPCC’s ECS of 3C.
Still waiting for the evidence rather than these appeals to authority.
WUWT are just quoting a peer-reviewed paper as far as I can tell. How has their credibility got anything to do with the study?
Simply referencing the IPCC AR6 report isn’t presenting evidence. Seems to me to be more of an attempt to dodge the question.
Where is this evidence of which you speak? Please show it to us. The consensus lie has been rehearsed over and over again on this site and...
Call me a denier all you what, but it won’t alter the fact that your “overwhelming majority of scientists and climatologists” is a pipe-dream.
Latest propaganda from The Guardian:...
It’s a straightforward applictaion of the Stefan-Boltzmann law when applied to the alleged forcing of CO2 in studies like Feldman et al (2015)...
The observations of the warming from CO2 and greenhouse gases that I have seen are all too small to account for the warming, so it’s not really...
But a correlation is essentially just a coincidence between two sets of numbers and it cannot prove that CO2 causes temperature changes any more...
But Antarctica as a whole is gaining ice at a rate of +1.3% per decade (see the fancy chart below). If you could prove that the warming from human...
Okay, I see what you’re saying. They have invested heavily in alternative energy, then. But they still emit about 30% of all human CO2-emissions...
China (the only country that really matters) doesn’t seem to care. [IMG]
Some places are losing ice, but some are gaining ice. Antarctica is gaining ice at a trend of +1.3% per decade.
So who can these ‘experts’ be? Hmnnn…. Ah, just a moment, wasn’t there that chap called Mann -- you know, the one who invented the Hockey Stick...
Separate names with a comma.