In the link below you will see a savage subhuman holding up a register with a gun and a knife. Now, mind you, Starbucks has a strict 'no guns' policy so I'm not sure how this could have happened. Regardless, a hero citizen jumps on the man and in the process gets stabbed in the neck with the knife. That, though, didn't stop hero citizen from disarming the thug, and then proceeding to stab the hell out of him. https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10156554578054012 The subhuman thug is now in critical condition. If only the thug had realized that Starbucks didn't allow guns, only knives - this wouldn't have happened. https://bluelivesmatter.blue/video-cregg-jerri-starbucks-robber/
Hero was a badass wasn't he! Technically the thug did obey the Starbucks policy as it was only a fake gun.
I was thinking the same thing you notice people pointing in the video? That guy was a bad a$$ ..to take him on. .
Yes, I did notice the people pointing in the video & wonder if it was a coincidence that the robber chose Starbucks because of its "No Guns" policy. Do you think that "Gun Free Zones" deter or attract violent, gun carrying criminals? I still can't imagine just standing around & watching as 1 brave man risks his life subduing an armed thug for an apparently thankless organization/store.
Do you think that "Gun Free Zones" deter or attract violent, gun carrying criminals? What I look at "gun free zones" or in my home town of Chicago as a "nuclear free zone" it's just a symbol to me..no one pays much attention to it...I am a gun owener like most and most of our guns just collect dust.... We know if we really have to pull it out their will be so many legal concinquence to our actions.. .
IMHO, "Gun Free Zone" simply announces "Sitting Ducks Await Plucking" and I suspect that most armed thugs feel the same way. Apparently, the thug in the OP mistakenly assumed the same thing. Thanks
The idea of a "Gun Free Zone" is actually two fold. It prohibits the gun toting white trash from walking around like the old west to make them feel they have a bigger dIck than they have, and it makes in very clear who a bad guy is. Mind you, I also own guns but respect them enough to leave them at home.
your first reason is pure biased opinion and the second opinion leaves people who would've defend themselves helpless. Is that enough reason to allow twenty people to die because it took the police five minutes at best to respond? The fact that you own guns does not validate your biased opinion.
I doubt a Starbucks has all that much cash. I literally cant remember the last time I've seen anyone pay with anything other than their phone or a card. Bet most people were probably like, who gives a **** if they get robbed. It's Starbucks. Like they're hurting?
Among my favorite quotes that "Closet anti Gunners" seem unable to grasp is: "When seconds count, the police are only minutes away." As we've seen over and over again, just because someone claims to "Own a gun" doesn't make them a valid 2nd Amendment supporter.