View Single Post
  #475 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2008, 09:05 AM
bugalugs bugalugs is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,452
australia au queensland
bugalugs has a reputation beyond reputebugalugs has a reputation beyond reputebugalugs has a reputation beyond reputebugalugs has a reputation beyond reputebugalugs has a reputation beyond reputebugalugs has a reputation beyond reputebugalugs has a reputation beyond reputebugalugs has a reputation beyond reputebugalugs has a reputation beyond reputebugalugs has a reputation beyond reputebugalugs has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 28,268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatriotNews View Post
I did that in the post if you would read it. I think you must have said a million times, " I am still waiting for you to show me some published research from a scientist."
That is the what you do. You have been denying there are any scientists who disagree with AGW over and over. And when someone provides a list of some you deny that list is valid.

You still don't get the point do you.

You keep telling us that there are scientists that think that AGW is not occurring. I have never disagreed with that.

What I do not understand is - if there are so many scientists that think that AGW is not occurring - why are so few of these scientists able to support this opinion with any sort of peer-reviewed research?

After almost a year of trying, out of all the research published on this subject in recent years - what have you found us? One paper by Douglass, Christie et al. And one paper over 10 years old listed on that blog you posted.

Why can so so few of these scientists that believe AGW is not occurring mount any sort of scientific argument to support their opinions? Where is the rigourous scientific debate?


Quote:
Originally Posted by PatriotNews View Post
Really, I understand you might not like the blog, but it does list dozens of articles, not just one dozen.
Yes - and why don't you actually go and read what those dozens of papers are about. None of them support in any way your statement that "global warming is a myth". I highlighted the only ones on that whole blog that were in any way relevant to your argument.

Why don't you actually read your own links before posting them.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Never Left View Post
Ignorence is bliss
Reply With Quote