Quote:
Originally Posted by The12thMan";p="
Sedy,
I understand what you mean. But my point was not about choosing or causing high risk behavior. High insurance costs was the excuse/reason for the policy. What if the company did cholesterol testing?
I don't believe that the real reason was high insurance costs. They could have easily passed the higher rates on to the employees.
And, I wouldn't dream of firing my diabetic employee. I would have a very hard time finding someone as competent and trustworthy to replace her.
|
But people are already screaming about the cost number 1.
second, only if they passed it on to the ones causing the increase by their own choice.
Same should go for cholesteral testing IMHO.
I guess I am just nit picky