View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2005, 11:50 AM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 23,117
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 152,474
Default From the mouth of your hero, Richard Clark (under oath)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beagle66";p=&quot View Post
From the very first warning that was haphazardly passed along to the FAA in April 2001 (or even better, if Condi Rice had taken seriously and implemented the terrorists threat report and plan given to her by Richard Clark in January 2001), if only the Bush administration (specifically the National Security Adviser -- Condi Rice -- after all that was her job) had not just turned the warnings over to the FAA, but turned them over to both the CIA and the FBI and said, let's seriously investigate any reports of terrorists in the US, of any terrorist in any way connected with aviation -- it would have been a week or less before all the FBI reports of arabs taking flight training that only involved flying the plane, not takeoffs and landings, the entire 9/11 conspiracy could easily have been tracked down and stopped in their tracks.

Instead Condi Rice spent the summer of 2001 touting America's need for a missile defense system and lost track of the warnings and failed to do her job.

Please don't tell me that 9/11 could not have been prevented -- it's very easy to see how a coordinated warning from the National Security Advisor to all national security organizations (just the FAA wasn't enough by a (*)(*)(*)(*) mile) would have revealed the plot and captured the hijackers and then exposed the details enough that airport security could have been increased to meet the threat long before 9/11.

Surely if Gore had been in office for 9/11, you wouldn't hear the Republicans claim how 9/11 was unforseeable.


SLADE GORTON, Commission member: Now, since my yellow light is on, at this point my final question will be this: Assuming that the recommendations that you made on January 25th of 2001, based on Delenda, based on Blue Sky, including aid to the Northern Alliance, which had been an agenda item at this point for two and a half years without any action, assuming that there had been more Predator reconnaissance missions, assuming that that had all been adopted say on January 26th, year 2001, is there the remotest chance that it would have prevented 9/11?

CLARKE: No.

GORTON: It just would have allowed our response, after 9/11, to be perhaps a little bit faster?

CLARKE: Well, the response would have begun before 9/11.

GORTON: Yes, but there was no recommendation, on your part or anyone else's part, that we declare war and attempt to invade Afghanistan prior to 9/11?

CLARKE: That's right.


http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB...B147/index.htm
__________________
Clintonite after Clintonite. My question is, "So when does this so-called CHANGE start?"
Reply With Quote