View Single Post
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2005, 01:18 PM
Rebellion's Avatar
Rebellion Rebellion is online now
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 12,509
Rebellion has much to be proud ofRebellion has much to be proud ofRebellion has much to be proud ofRebellion has much to be proud ofRebellion has much to be proud ofRebellion has much to be proud ofRebellion has much to be proud ofRebellion has much to be proud ofRebellion has much to be proud of
Credits: 79,503
Default ..

Quote:
Observation: Lewis was actively attempting to sell drugs. Intent to sell and intent to purchase are treated differently. For example being in possession of alot of drugs shows intent to sell. Whereas there seems to be no reference to an intent to purchase felony in that link.
Not exactly, no more active than those in the above story. There was no possession of drugs in that story, only an intent. I also believe Tefaro intended to sell, his wife mentioned a profit on the deal.

Quote:
Question: are all laws involving intent to sell and intent to purchase identical now to those laws at the tiem of the Jesse Tefaro case?
Conspiracy laws in Fla were put on the books in the early 60's, I see nothing to indicate they've changed.
__________________
JMS gets another English lesson:

Quote:
there is no "mostly unique;" thats like saying "sometimes always," its an oxymoron - its either one or the other.


The result:
Quote:
By the mid-19th century unique had developed a wider meaning, “not typical, unusual,” and it is in this wider sense that it is compared. The comparison of so-called absolutes in senses that are not absolute is standard in all varieties of speech and writing.
Reply With Quote