View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2005, 06:21 AM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 41
Posts: 17,637
usa us minnesota
raytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 110,883
Default Forest and trees

Quote:
Originally Posted by sam";p=&quot View Post
I never said Tolerance.org was the organization behind Writing for Change - that was your buddy, Glowdog.
No, Sinanju is the one who conflated those two. What *you* said is this:

Quote:
A couple of weeks ago it was reported that the We Are Family Foundation intends to distribute a guide entitled, Writing for Change, to 61,000 elementary schools. The guide, developed in cooperation with publicly subsidized Oregon State University, seeks to teach children tolerance toward people who practice homosexuality. Some of the topics covered by Writing for Change, which is intended for children ages four to ten.
Now, what is demonstrably incorrect about that is the following:

1. We Are family intends to distribute a children's video promoting diversity and tolerance, not a Writing for Change guide;

2. The Writing for Change curriculum is intended for college students, not children ages four to ten.

Can you at least admit that your original post was erroneous, and the outrage generated by it misplaced?

Quote:
As far as looking silly to Liberals, quite frankly I really could care less how I look to a bunch of fools.
It's not just Liberals you look silly to when get all worked up over a demonstrably false nonevent and then can't admit you made a mistake.
__________________
Man up.
Reply With Quote