View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2009, 11:08 PM
i.beletesri's Avatar
i.beletesri i.beletesri is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Garden of the Finzi-Continis
Posts: 3,026
djiboutil
i.beletesri has a reputation beyond reputei.beletesri has a reputation beyond reputei.beletesri has a reputation beyond reputei.beletesri has a reputation beyond reputei.beletesri has a reputation beyond reputei.beletesri has a reputation beyond reputei.beletesri has a reputation beyond reputei.beletesri has a reputation beyond reputei.beletesri has a reputation beyond reputei.beletesri has a reputation beyond reputei.beletesri has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 130,857
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_VD View Post

Israel could have ended the conflict years ago by withdrawing to the pre-1967 borders per UN Resolution 202.
That's Res 242

And You Know that's a Lie and have had it rebutted several times.
That's another place you cross the line from anti-zionism to anti-semitism.. repeating Lies knowingly.
One we dealt with just about 10 days ago.

Res 242 does NOT call for Israel to withdraw to 1967 Borders.

Resolution 242; What it REALLY means

Tho Israel DID offer the 1967 Borders right after that war in exchange for mere Recognition and the Arab countries refused. (Khartoum Conference)
Thus 'occupation'.
Thanks for the chance to post it again.

And of course the Current fighting is with UNoccupied/Returned Gaza while Israel Negotiates with the disputed West Bankers/Fatah/Abbas.
-

Last edited by i.beletesri; 01-19-2009 at 11:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest