Quote:
Originally Posted by rodog
Many aspects of the bible have been proven false utterly and completely. It isn't just unscientific it's filled with scientific impossibilities.
|
The Bible is filles with scientific impossibilities.
That does not disprove it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodog
Your distinction is irrelevant.
|
I'm sorry to say, but you admit that you don't seem know what a scientific proof is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodog
Last time I checked 21% does not constitute MOST it constitutes 1/5. Bad math on your part.
|
Yes, but you don't address my point.
You said, that I dont know what atheism is. Your argument for that is that 21% does not constitute most?
True, but that is not my only argument.
Many so-called atheists don't know what they talk about, even if that study didn't exist.
There are a few reasons. Mainly that it is a popular movement and popular movements are often followed by many who are ignorant to its real meaning.
Many declare to
know there is no god without evidence.
Saying you know something without evidence is having faith.
And I point out that declaring to be against religion, and following a faith is not knowing what you talk about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodog
Strawman. I never said you lumped atheism and agnosticism together.
|
Then what is your argument for me not knowing what atheism is?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodog
Riddle me this how exactly do you distinguish between scientifically being proven wrong and not being scientific? I would imagine talking snakes, resurrecting the dead and creationism all fall into both categories.
|
I suggest you start reading here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability
Just because it isn't there doesn't mean you can disprove it.
'Not scientific' is a term someone else came up with, I think it is supposed to mean 'not true'.
To proove there is a talking snake, you would have to find one, or deduct its existence mathematically from something else that is proven.
You can't really prove there is no talking snake. How to do that?
You can argue that it is very unlikely, but you cant proove it.