Quote:
Originally Posted by CIAagent11
The Bible is filles with scientific impossibilities.
That does not disprove it.
|
How inaccurate does the divinely inspired word of God have to be before you consider it disproven?
Quote:
|
I'm sorry to say, but you admit that you don't seem know what a scientific proof is.
|
Then by all means enlighten me.
Quote:
Yes, but you don't address my point.
You said, that I dont know what atheism is. Your argument for that is that 21% does not constitute most?
True, but that is not my only argument.
Many so-called atheists don't know what they talk about, even if that study didn't exist.
There are a few reasons. Mainly that it is a popular movement and popular movements are often followed by many who are ignorant to its real meaning.
|
And your evidence for your otherwise baseless claim that most atheists don't know what their talking about is that 21% of atheists aren't in fact atheists? You also assert that people are atheist because it is "popular". You make that assumption based on what?
Quote:
Many declare to know there is no god without evidence.
Saying you know something without evidence is having faith.
And I point out that declaring to be against religion, and following a faith is not knowing what you talk about.
|
Well I guess it's a good thing most atheists don't claim to KNOW anything then.
Quote:
|
Then what is your argument for me not knowing what atheism is?
|
Anyone who says that someone who does believe in God IS an atheist doesn't know what atheism is. Sounds like to me you are backtracking from that.
Quote:
I suggest you start reading here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability
Just because it isn't there doesn't mean you can disprove it.
'Not scientific' is a term someone else came up with, I think it is supposed to mean 'not true'.
|
I honestly don't have a clue what your trying to say here.
Quote:
To proove there is a talking snake, you would have to find one, or deduct its existence mathematically from something else that is proven.
You can't really prove there is no talking snake. How to do that?
You can argue that it is very unlikely, but you cant proove it.
|
Fair enough. Until someone finds something so utterly ridiculous as a talking snake I'll go the rational route and assume such a thing doesn't exist rather then assume it does.