"The Revolution would be done with strike and/or a coupe; no violence unless met with violence. "

Right when a revolution occurs it is the authorities that make it bloody. Havent got a very strong democratic streak in you do you?
Ignoring for a moment that this was what the Bolsheviks did anyway, why wouldnt this new regime be struck by the same problems as any soutocratic takeover? I mean if you are about to turn power back to the people anyway, in a situation where you needed a coupe in the first place then they will probably vote back to Capitalism. Or atleast away from the revolutionaries. Can you say, Duma?

"True but this was not the case with Lenin & Trotsky who practiced what they taught even after the Revolution"

Indeed. Stalin got the boots though, and he had help getting them. In what you propose similar silver-tounged power mongers would rally to your cause.

"No because Cuba's revolution happened with almost no resistance."

It has still required, or atleast been, an autocracy. It was still un democratic and experienced such outside pressures as I mentioned.

"The problem is that people moved to far away from Lenin's teachings. "

Lenin was still an autocrat who made sure he held power and the Bolsheviks came out on top. He dissolved the Duma for one thing when they voted against his party. Ruthless as all hell in the civil war right?
I'm not familar with any of Lenin's teachings on Democracy in the revolution, but fairly confident in his actions on the matter.

"No its not, Marx warned about this and Lenin pointed it out; its up to the People now. I predict that if insurance is privatized and Canadian medicine illegalized the Revolution will come."

Not sure what you are answering but you seem a bit hopelessly optimistic. I would have hoped that America would rise, if ever, when a president steals the election. But then theyt are Capatalists so maybe a squeezing of the more material will do it.
Personally i think that America is too lazy for revolution. Too fat.