View Single Post
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2005, 11:35 AM
Vassilij Vassilij is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 90
Vassilij is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,168
Default Narrowing the definition...

"One in North Korea that actually HAS a WOMD"

For your information they are called WMDs.

I hate when people say, "no nukes, no gas, no WMD!" and then shortly follwed by, "Bush lied, people died!"...

Let's think, what is a weapon of mass destruction?

We all have a general idea of what mass destruction is, but what of weapon?
These people that make claims I listed above have a very strict definition of weapon, "a bomb, or gas". They do this for a reason, it fits their agenda. My point is that WMDs need not be just bombs and gas, but people! Saddam and his sons are WMDs!

To the topic,
The war in Iraq is just the biggest branch of the war on terror. How hard is that to understand?
Reply With Quote