If you're going to analyze grainy pictures of airplanes, why no mention of this:

The right (top) engine extends the full depth of the wing, but the right (bottom) engine appears to be glued to the front of the wing.

Perhaps the problem is the photo, not a conspiracy?

There's been plenty of stuff written about Flight 93 and Cleveland -- most noting, correctly, that the speculation is based almost entirely on confused and inaccurate statements made by Cleveland's mayor at a morning news conference. There's only a problem here if you assume everything everyone said was accurate -- which makes no sense on a confusing day like 9/11.

Also, if Flight 93 landed safely, what happened to all the people on board? And the plane?

As for the Pentagon -- there are plenty of photos showing plane wreckage at the impact site. And Popular Mechanics, among others, explains how the holes in the building were created.

This stuff is really getting old. Uninformed people obsessing over grainy pictures, using leaps of logic and the statements of people under stress in a rapidly changing environment where nobody has a complete picture of what's happening as evidence of a conspiracy. Sheesh.

__________________
Man up.