Quote:
Originally Posted by amepro";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by catzmeow";p="
go hug a tree and take a bath... 
Actually, i see the same kool-aid drinking mentality from the left here that I did on b-net...people like Markh, amepro, kaladrew...non-critical thinkers the lot, they eat whatever pap is fed to them on indymedia.com and spew it back again without any fact-checking or critical reasoning on their own part.
If I see another "bush flip-flopper thread" that doesn't involve flip flops I think I'll puke.
On a lighter note, my company has an anti-"thong" policy...i guess our president is a little out of touch with current terminology involving this sort of footwear...and there is much speculation as to how it will be enforced.
by the way, tell your better half hi for me...she's a doll. |
FACT, I am partisan...and so are you. I have admitted mistakes I've made on this forum, that is a fact. So what exactly does "kool-aid" drinking mean? That I lean left? Yes I do.
Also, you claimed to be opened minded about sources and then wouldn't read the one I gave you because I did not read your National Review Source. If you're so open minded, you would have read my source regardless. |
FACT, I am partisan...and so are you. I have admitted mistakes I've made on this forum, that is a fact. So what exactly does "kool-aid" drinking mean? That I lean left? Yes I do.
Also, you claimed to be opened minded about sources and then wouldn't read the one I gave you because I did not read your National Review Source. If you're so open minded, you would have read my source regardless.
"Up-to-the-minute conservative commentary on politics, news, and culture."
Here are the tags on the National Review magazine when I googled it.
I wouldn't expect forum members to check out references from magazines like the "Nation" or "Mother Jones." You pointed out that SF news is liberal (MSNBC was the other source on same subject), I did not know this because I do not live in CA. I will remember that next time I look for references.
*** "
I will, just as soon as you read the article relevant to your original topic that I've already posted here."
I didn't think you read article because of your statement.