drinker, dear....
It's a refusal to look at any alternative viewpoints. That's the difference between us. It didn't bother me in the least to read the SF Gate article, I've used them as a source many times in the past to make points about liberalism. But you adamantly refused to read the National Review article, in spite of the fact that it was written by an expert in the field who was a GUEST to the publication, and wasn't one of their stock articles.
That steadfast refusal to open one's self up to alternative sources of information that might undermine your particular paradigm is what makes one a kool-aid drinker.
