wMd Means having Weapons capable of MASS destruction
A couple of ANTIQUE artillery shells do not make for mass destruction. They were not a threat to America's national security, and they constitute a pretty lousy pathetic attempt by desperate Repukers to coorborate all the lies told by the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Rice/Powell morons in the White House.
Oh, wait, maybe Repukers can once again deflect attention from Bush's disasterous movie debut in "Dude, Where's My Iraqis Cheering the Liberators?" and its sequel, "Mission: Unaccomplished" by telling us once again of all the people who believed Iraq had WMD (but of course none of them actually went to war nor were they the cause of the deaths of over 750 American soldiers and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis like Bush).
But Repukes are just addicted to "yeah Bush is a moron but we can always blame it on Clinton" mentality. It's really kind of sad -- I get that way whenever I see a deformed puppy, a severely retarded child or a Republican coming to terms with the fact that they HAVE to support Bush. lol
|