View Single Post
  #165 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2009, 12:48 PM
squidward's Avatar
squidward squidward is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,936
squidward has a reputation beyond reputesquidward has a reputation beyond reputesquidward has a reputation beyond reputesquidward has a reputation beyond reputesquidward has a reputation beyond reputesquidward has a reputation beyond reputesquidward has a reputation beyond reputesquidward has a reputation beyond reputesquidward has a reputation beyond reputesquidward has a reputation beyond reputesquidward has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 14,433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesman View Post
You are either in over your head or playing games. Do you not realize that "derivatives" are "derived" from something else? I simply said that car loans are not what caused the banks to fail. Car finance companies charged enough interest that a 15% increase in repos (from your link) isn't going to put them out of business. You can talk about derivatives or whatever else you want but the fact is that car loans are not a big factor in the bank failures/bailouts. I specifically said that home mortages were. If you want to disagree then do so and say that home loans were not a much bigger factor than car loans. Either that or concede. No more BS please.

inability to incur new debt was the reason for the collapse.
It prevented new spending/debt based growth and the rollling over of existing debt.
__________________
The most profound slavery must be that in which the slaves can conceive of no other possible or better world than their bondage.
Reply With Quote