View Single Post
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2009, 08:37 PM
BleedingHeadKen's Avatar
BleedingHeadKen BleedingHeadKen is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: California Über Alles
Posts: 3,673
us california
BleedingHeadKen has a reputation beyond reputeBleedingHeadKen has a reputation beyond reputeBleedingHeadKen has a reputation beyond reputeBleedingHeadKen has a reputation beyond reputeBleedingHeadKen has a reputation beyond reputeBleedingHeadKen has a reputation beyond reputeBleedingHeadKen has a reputation beyond reputeBleedingHeadKen has a reputation beyond reputeBleedingHeadKen has a reputation beyond reputeBleedingHeadKen has a reputation beyond reputeBleedingHeadKen has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 27,020
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WordWaster View Post
to your last point:

1)IF there is no recovery. as i am so fond of saying, "we will have to wait and see".
Yes, that's the usual "argument" from the economically ignorant. You can't defend your assertions, and so you hope that a trillion dollar gamble will pay off. I guess it's easier if it's not your own money.

Quote:
2)the positive parts of the bill are not digging holes. they are the parts that develop infrastructure. (something necessary to a strong economy)
Are we lacking the infrastructure needed to get back to where we were a few years ago? If not, then why will building more help us get out of the recession?

Quote:
3)this bill was not a permanent government expansion. if there is not recovery, the dems will not have the support to make it permanent.
I'm sure that Republicans will be just as happy to find ways to spend money.
__________________
“Some writers have so confounded society with government as to leave little or no distinction between them ... [Yet s]ociety is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness.” - Thomas Paine, Common Sense

"Bleeding head good. Healed head bad."
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest