View Single Post
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2004, 04:07 PM
SedyAlpha's Avatar
SedyAlpha SedyAlpha is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: second front ; Mexico
Posts: 1,091
SedyAlpha is on a distinguished road
Credits: 17,142
Send a message via ICQ to SedyAlpha
Default why repeat

Quote:
Originally Posted by SporkLord";p=&quot View Post
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1137484/posts

and an English professor concurs...
http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2939304

...
That one shell is a WMD! (*)(*)(*)(*) it! In fact one drop of Sarin is a WMD!
Wait, it isn't? Oh, well the Iraqi people are better now than under Saddam! We got rid of him right! You disagree? You terrorist!
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkH";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenaxFlatulus";p=&quot View Post
Marxist H is in denial.
Quote:
Originally Posted by F-R-O-G";p=&quot View Post
i wish we had a forum where only reasonable people could go... markH wouldn't be alowed...
Quote:
Originally Posted by HansMoleman";p=&quot View Post
is on Saddam Hussein. This "Warehouse" of documents you speak of did not properly account for his WMD, so it is funny that you bring it up because it only proves that he was hiding something. It hurts your argument.

Saddam Hussein had plenty of time to hide his WMD's. But we have found some of them. The sarin shells and mustard gas were a part of his arsenal. If you don't think that mustard gas is a WMD, read up on WW1. It is nasty stuff.
The obvious point is that the United States hasn’t found anything. It is obvious that Rumsfeld does not know where the WoMD are. It is obvious that your contention that we FOUND WoMD is not a very good argument due to the silence from the administration. All of those things are obvious. These are all facts, else where are the WoMD? (Fact 1).

They found a SINGLE SHELL which is NOT a WoMD ( FACT 2). Do you still contend that a single shell is a WoMD? Or a single Sarin shell is a WoMD? Or that two shells are a WoMD? I would say if they found a hundred shells or more, then yes, I would start to agree with you. I would disagree with you at, hmmm, let’s say 25 shells – that, to me would not be enough. But I could at least see your point there. If we found a hundred, I would be elated because it would help the United States regain world credibility and be a justification for our invasion. But saying 1 or 2 shells is a WoMD is just plain childish.

Why do you Neocons want to argue against the facts? You can't win, so your tactic is to attack me, attack my credibility, say the same thing over and over and over leaving out the facts and discussing red herrings (HansMoleman says, “If you don't think that mustard gas is a WMD, read up on WW1. It is nasty stuff.” – LOL, so what? They found 1 shell as far as I know. What are they going to do, load it up and shoot it at someone – Muhahahaha!). Then the Neocons complain and wish I wasn't here or that I could be shut up.

If you can't win the argument, you simply get rid of the people who are arguing with you! And then you call me a Marxist and demand censorship. Talk about hypocrites!

Great job guys! You've shown your true colors -- Fascists!
Summed up. PAY NO ATENSTION TO THAT MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN.
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest