Clinton would get more of the benefit of the doubt, because he wouldn't have a pre-existing reason or desire to attack Iraq.

But if he had tried to scare and mislead us, using cherry-picked intelligence, to justify the war, I'd be just as opposed to him.

I don't think Clinton would have done that, though. If he wanted to invade Iraq, he'd have just laid out his case and told us why. Plus, he would have done far better post-war planning.

__________________
Man up.