View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2006, 08:49 AM
amepro amepro is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,472
amepro is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,918
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForceoftheTruth";p=&quot View Post
I can agree only partially. After all, we have a military to protect our security. That is the primary basis for the state's existence (national defense). We would have more liberty without the existence of government than with it, but nonetheless we have to sacrifice a certain degree of liberty for security. On the other hand, once certain liberties are guaranteed in a Constitution, violating that Constitution is the ultimate threat to both liberty and security.
Force,
You seem like a thoughtful person. I've noticed that your answers seem indecisive. In another post, you said you don't vote because you can't choose between two bad candidates. I feel that sometimes you just have to stand up and make a choice and not stand on the sidelines.
__________________
I've been informed....don't blame Bush, he's "not in control"
That must make him out of control
Reply With Quote