View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2006, 03:18 PM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 41
Posts: 18,859
usa us minnesota
raytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 117,868
Default dgdgdg

To be fair, sometimes inaccuracies are inevitable when you're trying to distill a complex issue down to a quick sound bite. A lot of the debate errors were in that category -- what they said was roughly true, but either out of context or otherwise misleading. Others were more murky -- like saying "23 percent of Democrats are so-and-so" when that figure was based on one recent study. There's a basis for saying it, but it's misleading to imply that it is established, proven fact.

In the debates I gave the candidates a pass if what they said was mostly true, or at least based on an actual source of some sort.
__________________
Man up.
Reply With Quote