View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2006, 10:41 AM
Sadistic-Savior's Avatar
Sadistic-Savior Sadistic-Savior is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 14,622
usa us colorado
Sadistic-Savior has much to be proud ofSadistic-Savior has much to be proud ofSadistic-Savior has much to be proud ofSadistic-Savior has much to be proud ofSadistic-Savior has much to be proud ofSadistic-Savior has much to be proud ofSadistic-Savior has much to be proud ofSadistic-Savior has much to be proud ofSadistic-Savior has much to be proud ofSadistic-Savior has much to be proud of
Credits: 86,845
Default ...

Quote:
Although that sort of plan is fine by me (obviously), the Feds will never go for it. The Department of Education is here to stay, as are public schools.
That is actually what I meant.

The Public School System will be the new saftey net. It will be the default in areas where no company is willing or able to provide service. It will be the current status quo.

It is not an "either/or" situation. Both systems can function simultaneously. True the Public Schools will have less funding, but they will also have proportionally fewer students, so will not require as much funding. It evens out.

In the end it amounts to less cost for the tax payer (because the private schools will be forced to be more efficient) and more choices for the Parents. It will END dispute on things like Religion in school, free speech, ect...which in turn will result in few drains on the tax payers in the form of school lawsuits and whatnot.

I dont see a whole lot of downsides so far.
__________________
My Political Blog (Last post Feb 14) - My MySpace Page
Reply With Quote