View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2006, 06:20 AM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 17,759
usa us michigan
JavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 120,543
Default ...

Ah, I actually read his article in Scientific American. I think he's on the right track. My only thing is that I think we should only offer development help and not force it on countries. I'm not sure where Sachs stands on that.

I think the solution to aiding those in need in democracy lies in trying to find a way to make it impossible to deny. People in democracies do not like to think of themselves as selfish. But we often rationalize that the poor are not really out there in large numbers and that those who are poor deserve to be and could magically stop being poor without any help if they just chose to. That's in our culture moreso than in any institution.
It doesn't help that most in the middle class feel that they are struggling themselves. Our social standards for the ownership of junk are amazing. People give when they think they can.
And that leads us to the problem of charities. Which charities are the right ones to give to? And how can we make charities more efficient and more well-focused when they are not in existence for profit, which is much easier to use for motivation than altruism.
__________________
That information is classified and to be given only on a need-to-know basis...
And I do not need to know.

Get your daily dose of truth*

* or something approximating it
Reply With Quote