Quote:
|
Why would the wealthy consent to be part of anarchist communes? If they wouldn't and a socialist transition phase would be necessary, what reason do we have to believe that the socialist government would give up its power to the communes? Finally, even if such a society were possible, what would prevent its corruption and the formation of a government (probably worse than the original) by the more crafty and capable members of the communes?
|
The wealthy probably wouldn't consent. They'd therefore vote against communist rule in their soviet elections. If the communists still won then the'd have no choice but to surrender assets to the community. If they didn't then the assets would be seized. No socialist transaction phase necessary.
Instantly recallable electables would prevent representatives filtering off money, as if any found out they would be removed from power straight away. How would people know when someone was siphoning off money? Hold open council meetings at times when all can attend with discussions about everything passed. I'd also make the job of council representative unpaid (so to speak) so the person would have to work normally and volunteer to be a seat holder on the soviet.
What do you think Force?