View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2004, 09:47 AM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 23,748
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 156,548
Default You missed the point

Quote:
Originally Posted by truebrit";p=&quot View Post
Scalia WON'T recuse himself when there is an obvious question about is objectivity in a pending case...But in a non-existent, hypothetical case, Justice Ginsburg should automatically recuse herself??

WTF are you talking about...you are making less sense than usual old chap...
Truebrit....I am the one making the point that NEITHER SC justice should have to recuse themselves in such situations. It's partisan Democrats who want to pick and choose depending on their own partisan interests. Which was my point all along.
Reply With Quote