View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2006, 08:58 AM
Sadistic-Savior's Avatar
Sadistic-Savior Sadistic-Savior is online now
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 16,932
usa us colorado
Sadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 100,169
Default ...

Quote:
Sorry. I don't buy that Republocrats represent the majority. We should bring in run-off voting and put that to the test.
Sorry, the majority dont seem to want runoff voting.

Not that I would care either way personally. But the only time people seem to demand runoff voting is when their candidate doesnt win...

Quote:
Rationalization also comes in when you consider all the people who vote for Republocrats because they realize the alternates have no chance
No one is forcing them to compromise.

Quote:
But let's face it. As one who considers myself liberal, I am almost always going to vote for Crats over Pubs all things held constant.
That is a perfect example. You are choosing to compromise. No one is forcing you to.

I am an idealist...I dont compromise. If a candidate came along that represented my views more closely than the Republicans currently do, I would vote for them in a heartbeat. I turned on the Democrats, and I would turn on the Republicans just as easily. The only question is what party most closely represents my ideology.

And right now that is the Republicans in General, and Bush in particular.
__________________
My Political Blog (Most recent update Oct 3rd) - Which Flame Warrior are you?
Reply With Quote