Facts are facts. The main evidence appears to be the word of the stripper. She says she scratched the arm of one of the boys. The absence of DNA on the fingernails not only doesn't support that part of her story, it discredits it. She says they beat her, again discredited by the time-stamped photos. The allegation of a late search is meaningless because the police found the things they were looking for. Why didn't the perps get rid of incriminating evidence?

Not innocent little school boys? Guys get drunk at college parties all the time. Now we're going to use that to support an alleged rape? I speed sometimes when I drive, does that make me a shoplifter?

Timeline:
Original call alleging racial epithets - 12:53 am

Police arrive and find nothing - 12:55am-1:06am

Second call from alleged victim at Kroger 2 miles away - 1:22am

__________________
Do you know what it's like to fall in the mud and get kicked... in the head... with an iron boot? Of course you don't, no one does. It never happens. It's a dumb question... skip it.