View Single Post
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2006, 07:26 AM
BroncoBilly's Avatar
BroncoBilly BroncoBilly is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The socialist republic of Kalifornia
Posts: 5,193
BroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant futureBroncoBilly has a brilliant future
Credits: 72,353
Default And it has been posted to you

Quote:
Originally Posted by noetsi";p=&quot View Post
of who paid what percentage of taxes. Including analysis of the regressive impact of sales taxes. Regardless of what individual item they buy the lower income you are the higher percentage of your income you have to spend and do spend. This is not only theory its well documented and accepted by economist. And the more income you spend, the more of your income goes to sales taxes as a percent of your total income. No one who has ever looked at the data on sales taxes seriously disagrees that they are highly regressive. Try any text or economic analysis.

As for which taxes conservatives have cut or advocate cutting, read their journals or listen to their speakers.
Feds have nothing to do with sales tax in any state. So what is you point?

I would love to see sales tax cut period, but to try and monitor who is poor and to manage how sales tax is disseminated among those qualified would be near impossible.

You continue to hammer on about the cons plans, what is the dems answer?
__________________
Cheney is the second executive officer to shoot someone in the face and chest. Clinton was the first.
Reply With Quote