This story exemplifies how the republican party seems to always shoot itself in the foot. The democrats are really better at lying and sticking to that lie than the republicans ever could be. I am a republican, am I worried? No! After the left gets back in control, I am sure most republicans will support the dems effort on the war on terror. I will make the bet that we aren't and won't be nearly as visious as the left has been to Bush and team. I care more about our country than any stupid lying political party, and if that means supporting the dems effort on the war, so be it. I am looking forward to them fixing everything that is wrong with America in their first 4 years. They expected that from Bush and we will expect that from them.
chicagotribune.com
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/n...ationworld-hed
GOP candidates running scared
Voter dissatisfaction has party worried about losing power
Advertisement
Click to learn more...
By Jeff Zeleny
Washington Bureau
May 7, 2006
WASHINGTON -- Six months before Election Day, with control of Congress potentially teetering in the balance, Republicans across the country are beset by anxieties about the fortunes of their party and fearful that their dominance could be upended by an electorate hungry for a change.
The alarms, which have been sounding for months, are increasing in volume as the summer nears with feelings of discontent over the price of gasoline, the war in Iraq and illegal immigration. Though Democrats have yet to settle on solutions to those issues or a unified message for the fall, Republicans worry that many voters simply will be looking for a fresh start.
"The atmospherics right now aren't good for Republicans going into the fall elections," said Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.). "Right now, Iraq is the albatross hanging around our necks--it's like a weight out there. If we continue down that track and there is no substantial difference going into the fall elections, there are no guarantees."
Wave of dissatisfaction
Republican strategists and pollsters no longer rule out the possibility of losing the House--the Senate is less likely, they say--if a general wave of dissatisfaction over the direction of the country intensifies and begins overtaking local races.
While Republicans hold many advantages, considering that Democrats need to pick up 15 seats in the House and six seats in the Senate to win a majority, history is not on the party's side. Every president since the Civil War has lost seats in the House or Senate during his sixth year in office, except Bill Clinton in 1998.
To be sure, President Bush has defied history before, expanding his party's majority in Congress during his first midterm election in 2002. In 2004, he defeated Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and added congressional seats, the first president to achieve that feat since Franklin Roosevelt in 1936.
But this year, Republicans concede a key element could be missing from their arsenal: a motivation to vote.
"In 2004, people were passionate about voting for Bush and against Kerry. In 2002, there was a passion about the war on terrorism," said Joe Gaylord, a veteran Republican strategist and a principal architect of the party's 1994 revolution. "But in 2006, I don't see much passion on our side, which could make it a very dangerous year."
He added: "One of the reasons Democrats might do well is the sense that things just aren't right."
In gubernatorial races, too, Democrats are positioned to pick up a number of seats held by Republicans. Seven Republican governors are not seeking re-election, compared with only one Democrat who is stepping down, creating opportunities in Ohio, Florida and New York, among other states.
But as the six-month countdown to the election officially opens Sunday, the fight for control of Congress is drawing the most attention.
With polls showing that up to 7 of 10 Americans believe the country is on the wrong track, Republicans locked in tough races are distancing themselves from Bush and trying to find footing on their own issues. Another troublesome sign for Republicans came in a poll last week for the non-partisan Cook Political Report that found that among those most likely to vote in the fall, people favored the Democratic candidate for Congress over the Republican by 18 percentage points.
"Yes, it's bad," said Lance Tarrance, a Republican pollster who conducted the survey. "We're talking about pretty stiff numbers now that can't be ignored for House Republicans."
And for the first time, he said, his survey showed half of Americans "strongly disapprove" of Bush's performance. "Without a scandal, this is very rare," he added. "It shows the extreme frustration right now in the American public."
Can Democrats capitalize?
It's an open question, though, to what extent Democrats will be able to capitalize on the political climate. Five of the most vulnerable seats in the Senate are held by Republicans--Sens. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, Conrad Burns of Montana, Mike DeWine of Ohio, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island and Jim Talent of Missouri. Yet if Democrats are to reclaim the majority, they must win each of those contests--or a combination of five others--not lose any of their own seats and oust another Republican as well.
In the House, district boundaries have been carefully drawn to protect the majority of incumbents, Republicans and Democrats alike, which strategists say leaves only about 30 seats realistically in play. Still, Democrats are targeting states where Republican approval is particularly low--Connecticut, New York, Ohio--as among the places they hope to pick up seats.
"Race by race, Republicans have an advantage because there just aren't enough seats on the table for Democrats to win without a strong wave behind them," said Amy Walter, an analyst for the Cook Political Report in Washington. "But for many of these Democratic candidates, it could be like being in the right place at the right time."
Carl Forti, communications director for the National Republican Congressional Committee, dismissed the notion that Democrats would find success nationalizing the election. He said voters would be able to "draw a distinction between the national environment and their unhappiness with it."
"We don't live in a country where people go into the polling booth and vote for a Republican Congress or a Democratic Congress," Forti said. "They vote for a person and they have a relationship with that person."
John Hibbing, a political scientist at the University of Nebraska who has written extensively about Congress, said: "Tip O'Neill's famous phrase about all politics being local is cute, but it's dead wrong here. Politicians can do a heck of a lot by working hard on their constituencies, but they are also subject to national trends."
Indeed, some members of Congress who once assumed they would have relatively easy races are being forced to rethink their political standing. In New Hampshire, for example, a poll last week showed Rep. Charles Bass, a Republican, was leading his Democratic opponent by only 7 percentage points, even though his rival was virtually unknown.
"This is a reaction against Bush," said Andy Smith, the director of the University of New Hampshire Survey Center. "Since Bush is not going to be on the ballot in 2006, the voters right now are punishing other Republicans."
Before November, though, Republican congressional leaders hope to have a fresh batch of legislation including tax relief--as well as progress in Iraq--to present to voters.
Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), chairman of his party's congressional campaign committee, called Democratic candidates to a private meeting last week. The theme of his stern warning--to dampen expectations -- may have been unimaginable a year ago when Republicans were riding high and talking about building a lasting majority.
"Don't drink the Kool-Aid! We have a lot of work to do," he said. "Anybody that tells you they know the answer six months out is a fool."
- - -
Key midterm races
To gain control of Congress, Democrats would have to pick up six seats in the Senate and 15 seats in the House.
Here is a look at some races that could prove pivotal.
HOUSE
ARIZONA, 8TH The retirement of Rep. Jim Kolbe (R) has created a free-for-all in a district where immigration may play a large role.
COLORADO, 7TH Rep. Bob Beauprez (R) is running for governor, which creates an open seat in a state that is trending Democratic.
CONNECTICUT, 2ND Rep. Rob Simmons (R) tries to fight against ill feelings toward Republicans in his moderate district.
CONNECTICUT, 4TH Rep. Christopher Shays (R) touts his independence in a district where GOP ratings are low.
FLORIDA, 22ND Rep. Clay Shaw (R), after winning by fewer than 600 votes in 2004, faces a tougher challenge this year.
ILLINOIS, 6TH The retirement of Rep. Henry Hyde (R) creates an opening, with Iraq war veteran Tammy Duckworth (D) vying against state Sen. Peter Roskam (R).
ILLINOIS, 8TH Rep. Melissa Bean (D) tries to win a second term in a district long represented by Republican Phil Crane. Her opponent is David McSweeney (R).
INDIANA, 8TH Rep. John Hostettler (R) faces a tough challenge from Sheriff Brad Ellsworth (D).
INDIANA, 9TH Rep. Mike Sodrel (R) tries to win a second term as he faces former Rep. Baron Hill (D) yet again.
IOWA, 1ST With Rep. Jim Nussle (R) running for governor, Democrats are fighting for an open seat in eastern Iowa.
MINNESOTA, 6TH Rep. Mark Kennedy (R) is running for Senate, which creates an opening in the Minneapolis suburbs.
NEW MEXICO, 1ST Rep. Heather Wilson (R) struggles every cycle but faces well-known Democratic attorney general this year.
OHIO, 15TH Rep. Deborah Pryce (R) faces a strong challenger in Mary Jo Kilroy, a Democratic commissioner in Columbus.
OHIO, 18TH Rep. Bob Ney (R) tries to survive a federal probe into a corruption scandal, but Democrats field a political neophyte.
PENNSYLVANIA, 6TH Rep. Jim Gerlach (R) faces a rematch with Democrat Lois Murphy, whom he narrowly beat in 2004.
SENATE
MINNESOTA
(Open seat) Rep. Mark Kennedy (R) faces Amy Klobuchar (D), the county attorney in Minneapolis. Will Klobuchar be able to link this GOP congressman with problems in Washington?
MISSOURI
Sen. Jim Talent (R) is locked in a tough contest with Claire McCaskill, the Democratic candidate for governor in 2004. Will her support for stem cell research cause Talent trouble?
MONTANA
Sen. Conrad Burns (R) faces an unusually tough race because of ties to lobbyist Jack Abramoff. The Democratic challenger is not decided, but can the chosen candidate capitalize on Burns' woes?
RHODE ISLAND
Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R) is struggling to win a primary before looking to November. Has his frequent siding with Democrats put him in too precarious a spot with Republicans?
OHIO
Sen. Mike DeWine (R) faces Rep. Sherrod Brown (D). Will DeWine be able to inoculate himself from the troubles that the GOP is facing in Ohio and Washington?
PENNSYLVANIA
Sen. Rick Santorum (R) faces a challenge from Bob Casey Jr. (D), the state treasurer. Both oppose abortion rights, but will Casey, a moderate, be more appealing than Santorum, a conservative?
-- Chicago Tribune/Jeff Zeleny
----------
jzeleny@tribune.com
Copyright © 2006, Chicago Tribune