View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2006, 06:39 PM
EiregoSod's Avatar
EiregoSod EiregoSod is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: on your shoulder
Posts: 2,018
EiregoSod is on a distinguished road
Credits: 7,493
Send a message via AIM to EiregoSod Send a message via MSN to EiregoSod Send a message via Yahoo to EiregoSod
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebellion";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by EiregoSod";p=&quot View Post
The old CNN was biased towards Bush Snr.!!


To the average phoney-conservative, any news source that is impartial is biased towards the left.
like most liberals you either don't care about bias as long as it's your bias or you are so extreme left that you can't recognize it. Calling CNN biased towards Bush Sr leads me to the latter.

I happened to be overseas at the time Katrina hit last year, I didn't realize it until I came home, but the coverage was so biased and, more importantly, wrong and shabbily researched I have difficulty believing other stories aren't as badly researched. Links to foreign officials as well as former producers back my claims.
if what happened in Katrina had happened in any other country. The people would have expected their goverments to come to their aid immediately. And their governemtns would have done everything they could have to help them.

I recall that the phoney-cons were talking about murders in the Superdome, and the NG troops who delivered the first shipment of aid were too frightened to get off the helicopter in case a mob ran to kill them. Fact: the people needed help and there was no murders taken place.
__________________
I have something to hide.
Reply With Quote