View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2006, 07:32 PM
BroncoBilly's Avatar
BroncoBilly BroncoBilly is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The socialist republic of Kalifornia
Posts: 4,150
BroncoBilly has much to be proud ofBroncoBilly has much to be proud ofBroncoBilly has much to be proud ofBroncoBilly has much to be proud ofBroncoBilly has much to be proud ofBroncoBilly has much to be proud ofBroncoBilly has much to be proud ofBroncoBilly has much to be proud ofBroncoBilly has much to be proud of
Credits: 32,392
Default Wrong, wrong, wrong!

Quote:
Originally Posted by nonsqtr";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBilly";p=&quot View Post
It is one thing to hate Bush, and yet another to hate Bush so bad you would jeopardize your own nation's security.
This is the central issue, right?

The assertion that the nation's security was somehow threatened by this revelation?

I have yet to see any proof of that assertion.

After all, we're talking about banking records that are examined "after the fact" (sometimes months after the fact).

This isn't like wiretapping a phone call to nab a guy that's about to bomb the Sears Tower.

This banking thing is to "bring people to justice", like that guy from Bali.

My contentions are a) that the terrorists already new about this, b) that the NY Times was well within its rights to publish the information, and c) that this is just an obvious political ploy to rally the conservatives (TM) in advance of an important election.
The NY Times gave detailed info about how the US is tracking their money, and it is the main issue, try and find one positive article written about the Bush administration.
__________________
Cheney is the second executive officer to shoot someone in the face and chest. Clinton was the first.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest