Quote:
Originally Posted by nonsqtr";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by barney-fife";p="
Would it be okay had the NY Times printed a front page story in 1942 informing the world the US had broken Japanese codes and knew the contents of every message they sent?
|
You missed the point Barney.
The terrorists already know.
They've known for 8 years.
How much clearer do I need to get on this?
I just gave you a first-hand source that proves my contention beyond any shadow of a doubt. It's irrefutable and undeniable.
These Neo-Con weasels are lying to you. They're lying. |
They didn't know about it, if they did then we wouldn't have three papers putting it on their front page would we. Common sense anyone? What's next, the Times putting out a headline in the sports section that Denver beat Atlanta in the Super Bowl? That was 1998 too. That's because this wasn't public. FYI, saying the FBI is watching terrorists is not the same thing as saying "the FBI is watching Habib Al Qaeda on Feb 15 at 9am in front of him home on Main St." Note the difference, one is general and the other is specific. Additionally, we wouldn't have members of the 9/11 commission calling papers not to run the story and members of congress having to get clearance just to get specifics if they were already known.
I said nice spin above, nothing of the sort. Sounds like someone is doing the DNC's dirty work for them. It's physically impossible for someone to so easily miss the obvious.