Sorry did you have someone else in mind?

Is that a yes or a no?


So you have no actual link to a source, correct?

You just want to make blind accusations and then expect us to take your word for it? Are you high?




Maybe he is to you. Thats why I asked you the question at the top of this post. I am trying not to put words in your mouth because I'm such a nice guy.



But you cant show us where you got it eh? uh huh....



No, you claim it is from the US government. I am unwilling to take your word for it.


I am leaning towards "not" heh heh



All that assumes that we believe that your source is real, and not made up.

__________________
My Political Blog (Last post Feb 14) - My MySpace Page

When it comes to Chavez's word against the Shrub, Chavez has the greater veracity.

As per normal you are incorrect.

No.

Unfortunately for you the Shrub is always wrong by default

You search the Shrubs speeches

About the National Security Archive
An independent non-governmental research institute and library located at The George Washington University, the Archive collects and publishes declassified documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. The Archive also serves as a repository of government records on a wide range of topics pertaining to the national security, foreign, intelligence, and economic policies of the United States. The Archive won the 1999 George Polk Award, one of U.S. journalism's most prestigious prizes, for-in the words of the citation-"piercing the self-serving veils of government secrecy, guiding journalists in the search for the truth and informing us all."

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf


I seem to be unable to remember the last time you posted any proof of any of your assertions SS. Even after you had been specifically requested to provide proof. I do find you to be extremely reluctant to put any effort into your own education. All you have to do is type in Operation Mongoose or Northwoods. I shall be putting as much effort into refuting you as you put effort into refutations.



US actions show the veracity of my statements without having to trawl through a load Shrub speeches.

I have never known S-S to refuse to provide proof to anyone that asks him to back up his assertions. However, I'm known to be wrong once in a blue moon. If what you're saying about him is true, then please provide proof that he's done what you say he has.

It's common courtesy to provide proof of an assertion. Otherwise you should apologize and ask a mod to remove your previous post making the assertion. (If you are unable to do so, then at least admit it.)

The ball is still in your court.

__________________
"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left."
Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV)

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...080128-13.html

would seem dubya would like to send a bit of military assistance to quell any populist who might be reigning in the next country

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bushfan http://www.politicalforum.com/images...s/viewpost.gif Pelosi calls Mr. Bush a Failure in Eeverything. You just can't hide a public eduation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rusticus Rove is s the slime on which this whole administration slid.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raharu Haruha And spending money is nothing more than another form of voting.

SS has never supplied proof to any of my requests when SS makes unsubstantiated assertions.

The assertion has been proved by US actions and the links provided pointing out the reopening of covert and overt operations carried out by US agents in Foreign countries. And quite frankly I do not have the time trawling through the shrubs speeches
Bush Authorizes New Covert Action Against Iran


US Meddles Aggressively in Iran

Covert Action, Economic Pressure and Destabilisation

SELIG S HARRISON / Le Monde diplomatique (France) 1oct2007

http://www.ciponline.org/asia/articl...sonLeMonde.htm
And in Pakistan.
http://www.navyseals.com/u-s-may-boo...nside-pakistan

Despite the disaster of the invasion and occupation of Iraq, the Bush administration wants not just to deter Iran’s nuclear ambitions but maybe even to overthrow the Islamic Republic. It has already authorised ‘non-lethal’ action within Iran and helped separatist groups. But instead of supporting the country’s democratic opposition, US meddling has encouraged its hardliners to reinforce their positions

No it isn't.

One of my favorite quotes by him was, "Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a good book. Inside of a dog it's just too dark to read."

By the way... he was jewish. Something tells me he wouldn't approve of your admiration.

__________________
"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left."
Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV)

Sad fact is that we even have a poster that seriously takes Chevez point in hand.

I am sorry, but any man that wants to take way individual rights and choices to be replaced by socialism, needs to be removed.

I love how AK posts a document from 50 years ago on how they would handle Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis. A totally different situation and topic in history.
And I support my nation when it goes again freedom of the individual, whether that be Chavez, Clinton or Bush or anyone.

Point is, Chavez is an individual that is a dictator and uses politcal and social tactics that endanger individual freedoms.