View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2006, 01:42 AM
DuH2's Avatar
DuH2 DuH2 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,084
usa
DuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant futureDuH2 has a brilliant future
Credits: 45,767
Default .

Well to be honest I didn't find it at first..and given the hour (+1 on forum time here). I didn't t feel like looking that hard
So I addressed the general gist of what you where saying here.

Here it is.

http://congeorgekotzabasis.blogspot....y-its-own.html


..and where you address what I said in it.


Quote:
Of course, this method would not be effective against the suicide bomber who would be willing to lose his life by not abandoning the vehicle. Notwithstanding this however, the immediate result would be to diminish the number of car bombs by excluding the unoccupied vehicles of which many of them up to this point have been car bombs. And in the mid-term, the increased number of suicide bombers losing their lives by sitting in their cars, will deplete the ranks of the hardcore fanatics.
Like I said before its a reasonable proposition.
Reply With Quote