Originally Posted by Rino

Prove it. Also prove that what I said about smaller class sizes and the LE being underfunded is false.



I agree that we need to finish what we started. But that does not mean that we do not need to raise the budgets of some programs in the states.

Originally Posted by hellvsheaven

The teacher thing, my "Civics, and Economics" Teacher is a Liberal. He admitted it there. He also used to do Cocaine, and smoke pot on the steps of the captial building. He was arrested for assualting his wife TWICE, why is he still teaching? Becase he is a liberal, and his teaching methods instruct Liberal Mentallities.

Originally Posted by Rino

That does not prove that most or all teachers are liberal. Anyway. This does not matter. If most or all teachers are liberal, they were liberal before, so having more teachers does not make more liberals. There is nothing magical in being a teacher that makes someone go from conservative to liberal.

As for why he is still teaching, I do not know. Probably because your personal life does not affect your professional one unless there is a contract, or prerequisite that says it will. I have never heard of such a prerequisite that says a teacher can not be human.

The shop worker does not stop being a shop worker because he got into trouble.

Now do you agree that having more teachers means smaller class sizes?

Originally Posted by hellvsheaven

1. Domestic Violence like his charges, should leave him without his teaching job.

Originally Posted by Rino

There are no laws that say it should. Should the factory worker loose his job because he got a DUI? For a criminal charge to affect your job, it must be one that removes your ability to do your job.

Originally Posted by hellvsheaven

It all depends on what the job requirments are.

Originally Posted by PeaceMaker

US soldier, seven others killed in Iraq chopper crash

BAGHDAD (AFP) - A Russian-made helicopter belonging to the Iraqi military has crashed in northern Iraq, killing eight people on board, including a US soldier, a US military official told AFP on Tuesday.
ADVERTISEMENT

"There were eight onboard, including one coalition force member. Recovery operations have been completed and there are no survivors," said US Lieutenant Michael Street.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080304...FfHUn1nG1X6GMA

http://www.kuna.net.kw/NewsAgenciesP...67&Language=en

Five US soldiers injured in bomb attack south of Baghdad
Military and Security 3/4/2008 6:41:00 PM

BAGHDAD, March 4 (KUNA) -- Five US soldiers and two Iraqi civilians were injured as a result of an improvised bomb attack south of Baghdad on Tuesday, Media Consultant for Iraqi Multi-National coalition forces Abdul-latif Al-Rayyan said.
Al-Rayyan told KUNA that the improvised bomb targeted a US military patrol in Al-Siedyeh area south of the capital.
The US forces is currently investigating the incident and the type of explosive used.(end) mhg.mb KUNA 041841 Mar 08NNNN

Originally Posted by michaelbt18

Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaBlack
Necessity trumps principle.

This quote is amazing. It sums up every debate about this war. To any liberal who thinks that there is no principle in this war, (which there is: preventing our society from being attacked at random, and fighting the most evil group of people on the earth today, terrorists) this little quote makes their whiney arguments worthless. It is NECESSARY to fight, because if we dont stay on the offensive they will! If we dont keep Bin laden hiding in a cave he will plan another 9-11. If we didn't topple Sadam Husein than there would be one more country giving weapons to terrorists to use against inocent people.