View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2004, 12:57 PM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 22,663
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 149,184
Default Shouldn't be allowed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Demosthenes";p=&quot View Post
I think that State Rep. Straus who is quoted in the article is right. This is something that either side would be trying to do if in the others shoes. Though that doesn't make it right. I agrre with you though, no one should be trying to change the rules for what is strictly political gains.

-Demosthenes
Especially now. Especially DURING an election. Point is.....IF they think it necessary to change the law, that law should be changed in an off-election year when everyone is thinking more clearly. What do you bet they'll change it now.....and then IF the scenario is ever reversed, the Dems will change the law again?

This reminds me of what the Florida Supreme Court tried to do in the 2000 election. You DON'T change the election laws in the midst of an election.....all because it will benefit your side. It should NOT be allowed, IMO.
Reply With Quote